Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: wtc911
The same with putting more slugs into the guy once the threat has been ended.

And that right there is the point of contention. Ersland says the perp was continuing to be a threat. Prosecutor says not. Video is inconclusive (it doesn't show the perp). Ersland was there, Prosecutor was not.

Who ya gonna believe?

15 posted on 06/02/2009 2:58:23 PM PDT by ArrogantBustard (Western Civilization is Aborting, Buggering, and Contracepting itself out of existence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]


To: ArrogantBustard
You believe the autopsy report. If the shot to the head was debilitating then he's done for.

From the video it looks bad for the guy speficically for the time it took him to get the second weapon. That shows coherent thought. and that, in the law, is murder.

17 posted on 06/02/2009 3:02:49 PM PDT by wtc911 ("How you gonna get back down that hill?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

To: ArrogantBustard

It doesn’t really matter who you believe. The man (pharmacist) is innocent until proven guilty. I don’t see much more than a speculative case here.


24 posted on 06/02/2009 3:09:37 PM PDT by neocon1984
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson