Posted on 06/02/2009 11:14:41 AM PDT by Kansas58
"When media executives look at their shrinking audiences, they rarely attribute the decline to their liberal bias in covering the news. But recent developments at the Washington Post demonstrate that a return to fair coverage attracts readers.
Since Katharine Weymouth became publisher more than a year ago, and she named Marcus Brauchli, a former Wall Street Journal editor, executive editor in September, the paper has been making an honest effort to be fair.
Wash. Post Publisher Katharine Weymouth
Hit jobs against Bush administration programs and Republicans in general have virtually vanished. Instead, the paper presents issues fairly. No longer is the other side suppressed or relegated to the last paragraph.
Obituaries on such conservative icons as Paul Weyrich and Jack Kemp have run on page one. In contrast, the New York Times ran Kemps obituary on page B10, and Weyrichs, on B11.
As its second lead on May 21, the Washington Post ran a story saying that the financial system, frozen solid for the past nine months, is in a spring thaw. And its happening even though many of the Obama administrations major rescue programs have yet to get off the ground.
(Excerpt) Read more at newsmax.com ...
In a tough economy, the Washington Post is doing far better at subscriptions and revenue than ANY of its competitors!
Ollie North used to say that he read the Holy Bible and the Washington Post everyday so he could understand the agenda of both sides.
Look at MSNBC— they would rather lose their jobs than be objective.
The Compost is not “fair.”
It is 100% pro-Obama, and one will never read a negative word on him. Everything has a liberal spin. Throwing in the odd editorial from Krauthammer or Will does not qualify as “fair.”
The election is over. Their guy is in the White House with a huge majority in both Houses of congress. Let's see how they do during the next election cycle.
The WaPo just about single-handedly destroyed George Allen over his silly word macaca. I believe they'll do it again whenever they can.
“Hit jobs against Bush administration programs and Republicans in general have virtually vanished. Instead, the paper presents issues fairly.”
ROTFLMAO! Look who the Washington Post helped get in power—their man obozo. Pubs are no longer in power. Obozo Admin are perpetual screwups and the hits just keep on coming. But the Post isn’t going to print the screwups. They’re too busy spreading propaganda to the masses about the everlasting (gag) beauty of m’obozo. I hope the freepers DO NOT fall for any of this BS. Washington Post has not, will not and never will play the fairness game.
>Ollie North used to say that he read the Holy Bible and the Washington Post everyday so he could understand the agenda of both sides.
LOL - That’s funny and thoughtful at the same time.
“the paper has been making an honest effort to be fair.”
Translation: making an effort to return to more subtle distortions and calulated omissions. The problem the MSM has now is that it has come out of the closet. It mistakenly concluded that the majority of the public were so enamored with the ‘Bama that no one would mind the overt lies and fabrications, the end justifying the means. They were wrong, now they’re struggling to attempt to create at least an illusion of fairness. Hopefully, it’s too late.
So, basically they are admitting they used to be biased.
Washington Post fair and balanced??? Phil the Prince of Insufficient Light tells me that Heck just froze over!
Maryland “Freak State” PING!
Circulation isn’t good because of a perceived veering to the right. It is because they now offer Sudoku.
If dems are going to win anyhow, they'll be fair. If it's "close" - not as fair. And if it looks like Republicans might win - they'll do a "Lucy" and pull the football...
Time will tell if this is truth or trap. A part of me - the part that loves having coffee and a newspaper for breakfast - hopes this is true...
Precisely! It's amazing how many of these Democrat newsrooms become "fair" once their side has won and is safely entrenched in office. Only then do they see the opportunity to pretend to be real "journalists". Next thing you know they'll say something maybe kind of critical a little bit of their Obama.. "See? We're objective."
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.