Skip to comments.
Kim Jong-il chooses third son as his successor
Telegraph UK ^
| June 2, 2009
| Malcolm Moore
Posted on 06/02/2009 2:44:50 AM PDT by SolidWood
Kim Jong-il has formally named his third son, Kim Jong-un, as his successor as he prepares to stand down as North Korea's leader.
Kim Jong-il, 67, who is known as North Korea's "Dear Leader", suffered a stroke at the end of last year and has been incapacitated ever since.
South Korea's National Intelligence Service has now confirmed that the Korean People's Army, the Presidium of the Supreme People's Assembly and the ministerial cabinet have been asked to pledge their allegiance to Kim Jong-un, 25, the youngest member of the world's only Communist ruling dynasty.
"I was notified by the South Korean government of such moves and the loyalty pledges," said Park Jie-won of the South Korean Democratic Party, and a member of the government intelligence committee.
Kim Jong-un's elevation comes at the expense of his two older brothers, each of whom had previously been in contention to take the helm. Kim Jong-nam, the eldest, ruled himself out when he was caught trying to visit Disneyland in Japan on a fake passport in 2001. The middle brother, Kim Jong-chul, is apparently too "girlish" to rule.
(Excerpt) Read more at telegraph.co.uk ...
TOPICS: Breaking News; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: kimjong; kimjongil; kimjongun; korea; nkorea; norks; northkorea; ronery
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-62 next last
1
posted on
06/02/2009 2:44:50 AM PDT
by
SolidWood
To: SolidWood
He’s not long for this world anyway you slice it.
2
posted on
06/02/2009 3:02:17 AM PDT
by
allmost
To: SolidWood
Finally a world leader that Obama probably can connect with!
3
posted on
06/02/2009 3:40:07 AM PDT
by
mmanager
(It is time to prune the tree.)
To: SolidWood

North Korea's Stalinist cabal. What a missed opportunity!
4
posted on
06/02/2009 3:41:02 AM PDT
by
M. Espinola
(Freedom is not 'free'.)
To: SolidWood
... caught trying to visit Disneyland in Japan on a fake passport in 2001. The middle brother, Kim Jong-chul, is apparently too "girlish" to rule. LOL... you can't make this stuff up ... what's the problem? ...obviously the 2 older boys are just like their old man...
5
posted on
06/02/2009 3:56:34 AM PDT
by
Lurking in Kansas
(Never argue with an idiot. They drag you down their level, then beat you with experience.)
To: SolidWood
I had an interesting thought the other day. Kim wants to continue the dynasty, but there are rumblings that powerful generals do not want to continue it.
What he needs is a good old Stalinist purge of the generals, however if they are powerful enough they may strike back in self defense before he can complete it.
So what to do? How about setting off nukes and threatening the world in the hope that the U.S. will conduct some strategic strikes. Some of the generals Kim wants dead would then get taken care of by us, while he could kill others and blame the deaths on the Americans.
Just a thought.
6
posted on
06/02/2009 4:00:52 AM PDT
by
SampleMan
(Socialism enslaves you & kills your soul.)
To: SampleMan
It may be just the opposite. If chia pet provokes the US to strike, we’d likely be aiming right at him. Thus we take him out for the general puppet-masters that engineered the fiasco.
7
posted on
06/02/2009 4:10:17 AM PDT
by
lafroste
(gravity is not a force. See my profile to read my novel absolutely free (I know, beyond shameless))
To: SolidWood; AmericanInTokyo
AIT. What think you? Good or bad?
8
posted on
06/02/2009 4:19:30 AM PDT
by
A Navy Vet
(An Oath is Forever)
To: lafroste
To quote Bugs Bunny, “Could be.”
9
posted on
06/02/2009 4:21:45 AM PDT
by
SampleMan
(Socialism enslaves you & kills your soul.)
To: A Navy Vet
Bad. But expected. Thing is, there will be a lot of disatisfaction among the 朝鮮労働党 (Workers Party) and KPA military elite that none of them can never hope to rise to "leader" because they are not a member of the Dynasty. That is bound to piss off some people, most of them armed in some way. Who knows how Jong Nam and Jong Chul and their factions will respond as well. Defect to the West? Be offered plumb positions? Liquidated? Even now, mass party and military reeducation campaigns are commencing, reports have it, on the legitimacy and importance of General Kim Il Sung's rule being passed down to his grandson, General Kim Jong Un, be allowed to occur unimpeded. A coup d'etat, only if for good reasons, will probably be a good thing long term wise but not when it occurs. Particularly if a reformer gets in and liquidates the inner circle to the Kim Family....I might add, this of course would be a near miracle and would offer very unstable days for awhile.
10
posted on
06/02/2009 4:37:35 AM PDT
by
AmericanInTokyo
("North Korea would NEVER try this stuff were BUSH still prez" is a line of crap. They DID!)
To: SolidWood
Oh great. A millennial dynastic communist crown prince.
11
posted on
06/02/2009 4:43:45 AM PDT
by
magellan
To: SolidWood
To: SolidWood
Happy Days
13
posted on
06/02/2009 4:44:40 AM PDT
by
Dallas59
("You know the one with the big ears? He might be yours, but he ain't my president.")
To: Dallas59
He’ll be lucky to last the week after Kim is gone.
14
posted on
06/02/2009 4:47:24 AM PDT
by
AppyPappy
(If you aren't part of the solution, there is good money to be made prolonging the problem.)
To: Dallas59
Maybe his second son wouldn’t be “girlish” if they got him a boys haircut and didn’t dress him in pink. Just a thought.
To: Anitius Severinus Boethius
Yes but that certainly was the craze and the fashion in the early 1970s!
16
posted on
06/02/2009 4:53:29 AM PDT
by
AmericanInTokyo
("North Korea would NEVER try this stuff were BUSH still prez" is a line of crap. They DID!)
To: AmericanInTokyo
To: SolidWood

Kim Jong-Un
The Un-Jong
18
posted on
06/02/2009 5:20:27 AM PDT
by
LayoutGuru2
(In the name of diversity, we are all becoming exactly the same.)
To: Dallas59
19
posted on
06/02/2009 5:42:37 AM PDT
by
theDentist
(qwerty ergo typo : i type, therefore i misspelll)
To: AmericanInTokyo
Unstable days we can do. Unstable months, years, decades are a different story. Thanks for your analysis.
20
posted on
06/02/2009 5:49:51 AM PDT
by
hoosiermama
(Hey hey! Ho ho! Where's your Birth Certificate/ We've a right to know!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-62 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson