Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Sub-Driver
Cheney ignores one of the two primary reasons for the founding of his very own party: the protection of marriage as being between one man and one woman.

1856 Republican Platform

Resolved, That the Constitution confers upon Congress sovereign powers over the Territories of the United States for their government; and that in the exercise of this power, it is both the right and the imperative duty of Congress to prohibit in the Territories those twin relics of barbarism—Polygamy, and Slavery.


By the way, there are several states that were not allowed into the Union without forever swearing off plural marriage.

53 posted on 06/01/2009 1:34:16 PM PDT by EternalVigilance (They tell you that conservatism "can't win" because they don't believe in it. Duh...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: EternalVigilance

“those twin relics of barbarism—Polygamy, and Slavery. “

No mention of buggery...


59 posted on 06/01/2009 1:37:45 PM PDT by jessduntno (July 4th, 2009. Washington DC. Gadsden Flags. Be There.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies ]

To: EternalVigilance

So was the Prophet Abraham and some gay guys in San Francisco moral equals?


68 posted on 06/01/2009 1:40:47 PM PDT by Bushwacker777
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies ]

To: EternalVigilance

Excellent post, thanks for the reminder.


72 posted on 06/01/2009 1:42:53 PM PDT by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies ]

To: EternalVigilance

And the reason we don’t own Mexico today was because the US government (northern Republicans) did not want to admit Mixico into the union and divide it up since it was below the Mason-Dixon Line and would have increased the number of slave states. Just thihnk if Mexico had been a part of the US from the 1840s and could have been fully integrated into US cultural patterns. Thanks for nothing Lincoln.


77 posted on 06/01/2009 1:44:11 PM PDT by Bushwacker777
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies ]

To: EternalVigilance
Good post, Also, see Reynolds vs the US.

Even though it was a polygamy case, it defined marriage as one man one woman

111 posted on 06/01/2009 2:05:26 PM PDT by Las Vegas Ron (zer0 is doing to capitalism what Kennedy did to health care)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson