[ketsu]

What I find funny is ostensible moral absolutists using moral relativism to make a point. (I haven’t been reading these threads much, though).

Ding ding ding.

[1rudeboy]

I'm going to need more than a few drinks to think this out: logically, if one is to claim that the murder of this doctor is justified because of a higher law, then why should one expect the murderer to be "absolved" (too early to think of a more accurate word) by the law?

One should claim the protection of the higher law, yes?