To: aft_lizard
So he’s a rogue extremist. Not a representative pro-lifer.
He deserves the death penalty if convicted.
15 posted on
05/31/2009 4:44:57 PM PDT by
paulycy
(BEWARE the LIBERAL/MEDIA Complex)
To: paulycy
So hes a rogue extremist. Not a representative pro-lifer.
He deserves the death penalty if convicted.If it's even him.
16 posted on
05/31/2009 4:46:16 PM PDT by
paulycy
(BEWARE the LIBERAL/MEDIA Complex)
To: paulycy
No he doesn’t. And I know the left, being against the death penalty, won’t ask for it.
70 posted on
05/31/2009 7:13:08 PM PDT by
lara
To: paulycy
NO! He does not. This case has the potential to go to a higher court if pursued.
To: paulycy
I’m a pro-life right-winger, and I would volunteer to throw the switch on this numbnut.
108 posted on
05/31/2009 8:06:49 PM PDT by
dfwgator
(1996 2006 2008 - Good Things Come in Threes)
To: paulycy
“So hes a rogue extremist. Not a representative pro-lifer.
He deserves the death penalty if convicted.”
what the heck does that mean?
126 posted on
05/31/2009 9:23:27 PM PDT by
Tulsa Ramjet
("If not now, when?" "Because it's judgment that defeats us.")
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson