Your presumptuous lecture to Safrguns was actually more smarmy, smug, and obnoxious than the Rich piece. It’s what self-absorbed and effete libs do when they don’t have the facts beforehand. They jump to conclusions and make ASSumptions. They also frequently scream ‘’Hey! look at me! See how ‘intellectual’ I am! I need attention!’’ You try to have a bold ‘’in your face’’ style, which is then diminished by your plead for Safrgun’s validation and ridiculously cutesy emoticon. (I hope Safrguns tells you to eff off. lol!)
Hmmmm. I see. Kind of like what you do here, eh? A quick point for your consideration:
I didn't attack SafrGuns personally, I attacked the concept of "Safer Guns," which deserves attacking. SafrGuns, showing much more sense than you, replied by explaining that his logon was a parody of the idiotic concept of "Safer Guns."
In other words, he and I actually agree on that point. You, on the other hand, have shown that you (...just like the liberal a%%holes you pretend to dislike so much) are more than willing to personally attack and denegrate someone with whom you disagree merely because they disagree.
In an open forum of ideas, such sphincters eventually make no meaningful contribution at all. But, I'm sure you'll keep typing your inane drivel anyway. Good luck with that. You're really good at it...
;-/
Just kidding. All in good fun, eh?
;-/