To: BunnySlippers
"White boys can pound sand"
Seems to sum it up.
2 posted on
05/30/2009 7:43:00 PM PDT by
ex91B10
("Search" and "Preview" are your friends...)
To: BunnySlippers
3 posted on
05/30/2009 7:44:33 PM PDT by
BunnySlippers
(I LOVE BULL MARKETS . . .)
To: BunnySlippers
The White House, concerned that a reversal would be seen as an embarrassment for its nomination, is rolling out a multi-pronged strategy to explain the case and Sotomayor's role in it
Socialist spin meaning they will twist the facts.
4 posted on
05/30/2009 7:45:06 PM PDT by
Man50D
(Fair Tax, you earn it, you keep it!)
To: BunnySlippers
We white people need to be "exceedingly careful" when attacking racists and bigots who are not Republicans.
sarc
6 posted on
05/30/2009 7:57:39 PM PDT by
FlingWingFlyer
(Gibbs needs to be "exceedingly careful" when threatening the American people.)
To: BunnySlippers
Federal guidelines presume discrimination when a test has such a disparate impact on minorities. That's the crux of the problem. It presumes that all races and creeds have identical talents and work habits and that the only explanation for results such as in this firefighter's exam is discrimination.
Thomas Sowell, a terrific economist and a gifted author (who, incidentally, happens to be African-American) expounds on this topic in many of his books and columns, indicating that there is no evidence to support the theory that people who come from different cultures, with different genetic makeups, should be exactly equal in their talents and ambitions. Why is nearly every professional hockey player white, while nearly every basketball player is black? (Hint--it's not due to discrimination.)
To: AdmSmith; Berosus; Convert from ECUSA; dervish; Ernest_at_the_Beach; Fred Nerks; george76; ...
It is the 134-word summary order in Ricci v. DeStefano, which upheld the decision of New Haven, Conn., to throw out the promotion test it had given city firefighters when no African Americans and two Hispanics qualified for advancement. The case is under review by the Supreme Court that Sotomayor would join. If the decision is reversed -- which, from the tone of oral arguments in April, seems a distinct possibility -- the high court's ruling will probably come at the end of June, just as the Senate and the nation begin to consider Sotomayor's qualifications. The White House, concerned that a reversal would be seen as an embarrassment for its nomination, is rolling out a multi-pronged strategy to explain the case and Sotomayor's role in it. The first step was to offer a collection of legal experts who say the ruling marks Sotomayor not as a judicial activist, or even a supporter of minority rights, but as a conservative jurist whose actions show how closely she hews to court precedent.
|
"Y'know, 'cause conservatism is what I'm all about. Just ask the terrorism risks returning from service in the US armed forces, or the xenophobic primitives clinging to their guns, or, uh, wait, I think someone's having some fun with my teleprompter." |
10 posted on
05/30/2009 9:04:55 PM PDT by
SunkenCiv
(https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/____________________ Profile updated Monday, January 12, 2009)
To: BunnySlippers
Why doen't Obama just nominate Chavez or Castro? Historic to say the least!
There are no rules and there are no testicles in the GOP Caucus. So, shoot for the moon, Obama!
11 posted on
05/30/2009 10:13:18 PM PDT by
April Lexington
(Study the constitution so you know what they are taking away!)
To: BunnySlippers
ACTIVIST! Activist! Nyah, nyah, nyah!
To: BunnySlippers
two Hispanics qualified Wonder why Sotomayor threw it out? Her "group" got what it wanted. That's all that matters, right?
14 posted on
05/31/2009 4:49:17 AM PDT by
Hardastarboard
(I long for the days when advertisers didn't constantly ask about the health of my genital organs.)
To: BunnySlippers
Sotomayor’s the “Latino Grievance” nominee......every ruling from the beach ironclad to redress every latino grievance
Americans will be paying with our freedoms ......for those Frito Bandito commercials.
15 posted on
05/31/2009 11:50:16 AM PDT by
Liz
(When people fear govt, we have tyranny; when govt fears the people, we have freedom.)
To: BunnySlippers
BUMPER STICKER:
“Sotomayor is for RACIAL PROFILING!”
17 posted on
05/31/2009 1:45:19 PM PDT by
AlanGreenSpam
(Obama: The First 'American IDOL' President - sponsored by Chicago NeoCom Thugs)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson