You wrote:
“I disagree. I think the article is actually quite brilliant.”
I made a comment about the people who vote for Obama apologizing. I said nothing about the article itself. I am not sure what you’re disagreeing with then.
“It will persuade many more stupid people not to vote for Obama next time than any amount of scolding from people like us ever could.”
I’m not scolding them. I also don’t think that Obama voters will read this article.
“There are alot more stupid people in this world than there are Conservatives. Unfortunately stupid people also get to vote. Far better it is that they recognize their stupidity and vote properly the next time.”
I am the one who wants them to recognize their own stupidity. Hence, the apology.
“Remember that someone very famous once said “if they are not against us they are for us.””
And in this case, he would be wrong. Our own party wasn’t against us, but it certainly wasn’t for us.
> I made a comment about the people who vote for Obama apologizing. I said nothing about the article itself. I am not sure what you’re disagreeing with then.
Perhaps I misunderstood your intent... you were responding in agreement to somebody who was responding negatively to the writer of the article. I took that to mean that you didn’t think much of the article — which was brilliant.
> And in this case, he would be wrong. Our own party wasn’t against us, but it certainly wasn’t for us.
I almost forgot — it was Jesus who said that.