To: pantherskincreek
So a new law will prevent the govt from breaking an old law? And what do you do when they decide to break the new law? take it court?
2 posted on
05/28/2009 10:09:46 AM PDT by
driftdiver
(I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
To: pantherskincreek
Hmmmmmm. Martial Law is defined by the setting aside of normal law. So here we have a normal law that restricts martial law. The logic is perplexing.
That said, I salute their spirit.
3 posted on
05/28/2009 10:12:45 AM PDT by
SampleMan
(Socialism enslaves you & kills your soul.)
To: pantherskincreek
Under martial law all bets are off and you are on your own.
The last thing I would do is surrender my arms, no effin way!
Martial law in the USA would be nothing less than anarchy!
Molon Labe!
4 posted on
05/28/2009 10:13:40 AM PDT by
devistate one four
(Back by popular demand: America love or leave it (GTFOOMC) TET68)
To: pantherskincreek
Now, it’s even more illegaler.
8 posted on
05/28/2009 10:21:28 AM PDT by
SJSAMPLE
To: pantherskincreek
THe federal Courts will throw it out — because the rule of WASHINGTON trumps the rule of the “sovereign” states in our current perverted, antiConstitutional reality.
12 posted on
05/28/2009 10:37:35 AM PDT by
patriot preacher
(To be a good American Citizen and a Christian IS NOT a contradiction. (www.mygration.blogspot.com))
To: pantherskincreek
13 posted on
05/28/2009 10:38:23 AM PDT by
Rummyfan
(Iraq: it's not about Iraq anymore, it's about the USA!)
To: pantherskincreek
Its been a bad year for gun grabbers in Tennessee, as well as the Memphis Commercial Appeal.
14 posted on
05/28/2009 10:39:34 AM PDT by
oyez
(To the extent veterans read it as an accusation -- and apology is owed(i.e. not given))
To: ForGod'sSake
16 posted on
05/28/2009 10:42:59 AM PDT by
houeto
(Defang the FEDGOV. Repeal the 17th!)
To: pantherskincreek
20 posted on
05/28/2009 10:53:32 AM PDT by
Concho
( No Birth Certificate-No Census!)
To: pantherskincreek
Hmmm! let's see....Wisconsin law says "open carry" is legal but that hasn't stopped the gun-grabbing Polizei from creating havoc by issuing arrest warrants, confiscating weapons, and running up legal costs for abiding citizens who happen to be carrying openly.
Why do I think that TN Polizei will confiscate at first opportunity and let the courts sort it out later.
Makes sense, since many of the citizens so affected could already be at ground temperature as a result of being defenseless. That would minimize the number of subsequent court cases against the Polizei.
22 posted on
05/28/2009 11:06:52 AM PDT by
SuperLuminal
(Where is another agitator for republicanism like Sam Adams when we need him?)
To: pantherskincreek
How about a law banning the implementation of Martial Law?
25 posted on
05/28/2009 11:25:02 AM PDT by
wastedyears
(Rock and roll ain't worth the name if it don't make ya strut)
To: pantherskincreek
There is only one way to prevent the State from confiscating guns. That is to stop (with deadly force if necessary) any State minion who tries.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson