Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Sotomayor reversed 60% by high court
Washington Times (via Drudge) ^ | 5/27/09 | Stephen Dinan

Posted on 05/27/2009 8:11:50 AM PDT by dervish

Three of the five majority opinions written by Judge Sotomayor for the 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals and reviewed by the Supreme Court were reversed, providing a potent line of attack raised by opponents Tuesday after President Obama announced he will nominate the 54-year-old Hispanic woman to the high court.

"Her high reversal rate alone should be enough for us to pause and take a good look at her record. Frankly, it is the Senates duty to do so," said Wendy Wright, president of Concerned Women for America.

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtontimes.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 2ndcircuit; activistjudge; cwa; judicialtyranny; notfitforscotus; obamanation; racist; soniasotomayer; sotomayer; sotomayortruthfile
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-47 next last

1 posted on 05/27/2009 8:11:51 AM PDT by dervish
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: dervish
Only 60%?

Pretty good for a non-originalist. Likely better than a former ACLU lawyer.

2 posted on 05/27/2009 8:13:35 AM PDT by Paladin2 (Big Ears + Big Spending --> BigEarMarx, the man behind TOTUS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dervish

I heard it was more like 80%.


3 posted on 05/27/2009 8:13:52 AM PDT by RC2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paladin2

Cases Reviewed by the Supreme Court
• Ricci v. DeStefano 530 F.3d 87 (2008) — decision pending as of 5/26/2009
• Riverkeeper, Inc. vs. EPA, 475 F.3d 83 (2007) — reversed 6-3 (Dissenting: Stevens, Souter, Ginsburg)
• Knight vs. Commissioner, 467 F.3d 149 (2006) — upheld, but reasoning was unanimously faulted
• Dabit vs. Merrill Lynch, 395 F.3d 25 (2005) — reversed 8-0
• Empire Healthchoice Assurance, Inc. vs. McVeigh, 396 F.3d 136 (2005) — reversed 5-4 (Dissenting: Breyer, Kennedy, Souter, Alito)
• Malesko v. Correctional Services Corp., 299 F.3d 374 (2000) — reversed 5-4 (Dissenting: Stevens, Souter, Ginsburg, Breyer)
• Tasini vs. New York Times, et al, 972 F. Supp. 804 (1997) — reversed 7-2 (Dissenting: Stevens, Breyer)


4 posted on 05/27/2009 8:14:12 AM PDT by astyanax (Had enough Hope and Change yet?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: astyanax

http://startthinkingright.wordpress.com/2009/05/26/sonia-sotomayor-another-radical-in-robes/


5 posted on 05/27/2009 8:15:30 AM PDT by astyanax (Had enough Hope and Change yet?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: dervish

Obama’s SCOTUS candidate nominee does NOT UNDERSTAND THE CONSTITUTION !

Next !


6 posted on 05/27/2009 8:16:42 AM PDT by 4Speed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RC2

The list in post #4 shows 71% (5 of 7).


7 posted on 05/27/2009 8:17:13 AM PDT by Cletus.D.Yokel (FreepMail me if you want on the Bourbon ping list!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: dervish

Legally wrong, yes...but her HEART was in the “right place!” And that’s all that matters, right? After all, that’s why Hussein picked her! A dedicated, mindless, America hating, Constitution ignoring, radical leftist! You know, like Hussein himself!


8 posted on 05/27/2009 8:18:08 AM PDT by Oldpuppymax (AGENDA OF THE LEFT EXPOSED)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dervish

She is a reflection of the Ninth Circuit Court — overturned to a high degree based on the Constitution.

She, like her nominator, are very anti-Constitution. But she fits the “agenda mold”, pandering to every corner of the far-left voting base.


9 posted on 05/27/2009 8:18:09 AM PDT by EagleUSA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cletus.D.Yokel

send this to Drudge!


10 posted on 05/27/2009 8:18:13 AM PDT by dervish (I'm the President see me bow (at 0:50) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S60U-hl35Gw)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: dervish

I heard it was 4 out out 5 rejected.


11 posted on 05/27/2009 8:18:50 AM PDT by RexBeach ("Do your duty in all things." Robert E. Lee)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: astyanax
So who's doing the math?

I get 83% reversal from your case list. There's likely quite a number of cases where the decision was not appealed (correct or not. One only receives the Justice one chooses to afford).

12 posted on 05/27/2009 8:19:06 AM PDT by Paladin2 (Big Ears + Big Spending --> BigEarMarx, the man behind TOTUS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: dervish

And one more Pending....makes it unbearable, unacceptable.

Thanks BHO for bringing this problem of Judges ignoring the Constitution to the “front row” .


13 posted on 05/27/2009 8:19:48 AM PDT by 4Speed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dervish
The White House was cognizant of the danger that case could present. An administration official, briefing reporters after the announcement, said Judge Sotomayor was not specifically asked about the case since it may come back before the Supreme Court with her as a member.

Should we infer from this that she doesn't have the character to recuse herself?

14 posted on 05/27/2009 8:19:55 AM PDT by Bob Buchholz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dervish
She is likely a terrible pick but that stat isn't really out of ordinary
Now let's look at how often the Supreme Court decides that the 9th got it wrong. Last term, the Supreme Court's reversal rate for 9th Circuit cases was 90.5 percent. Yikes—that's huge! But wait, for on-the-merits cases, the Supremes reversed the 3rd and 5th Circuits almost all of the time* last term. Cases from state appellate courts fared no better: They also had a 100 percent reversal rate. Overall, this past term the Supreme Court reversed 75.3 percent of the cases they considered on their merits. The pattern holds true for the 2004 and 2005 terms as well, when the Supremes had overall reversal rates of 76.8 percent and 75.6 percent, respectively. For those years, the 9th was reversed 84 percent and 88.9 percent of the time, or about a case or two more each year than it would have been if it had conformed to the reversal rate of the other circuits. How do one or two cases a year add up to a court run amuck?

15 posted on 05/27/2009 8:20:18 AM PDT by neutrality
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dervish
And Arlen Specter says she's great; he's probably thinking of ancient Scottish law, however.

We should be happy that she's been overturned so much, and this certainly shows she's no scholar. Merit is not the issue for Obama. Identity politics and some weird and nebulous notion of "empathy" is Obama's proclaimed guiding principle.

16 posted on 05/27/2009 8:21:23 AM PDT by elhombrelibre (Obama closes Gitmo to save terrorists and funds foreign abortions.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dervish

A 60% turnover for Sodomizer is uncalled for and probably unprecidented in Supreme Ct. nominees. Republicans on the committee had better question every case she had reversed.


17 posted on 05/27/2009 8:21:33 AM PDT by FrdmLvr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dervish
She is a woman and a "Latina", therefor it is racist and sexist to suggest anything negative towards The Messiah's pick.
18 posted on 05/27/2009 8:21:43 AM PDT by lormand
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

How about this forsight?

“On Sept. 30, the day of her confirmation hearing, Rush Limbaugh, the conservative radio talk show host, warned the Senate that Judge Sotomayor was an ultraliberal who was on a ‘’rocket ship’’ to the Supreme Court. That day, Judge Sotomayor was questioned closely by Republicans.

In the end, the only Republicans to vote against her were Senator John Kyl of Arizona and Senator John Ashcroft of Missouri. The committee’s other conservative members, including Orrin G. Hatch of Utah and Strom Thurmond of South Carolina, voted in her favor. Mr. Kyl and Mr. Ashcroft declined to comment today.

The confirmation delay comes as Ralph K. Winter, chief judge of the Second Circuit, has complained that unfilled vacancies on the court have created its worst backlog in history. In his annual report, Judge Winter, a conservative Republican, lamented that he had to declare judicial emergencies several times to allow retired judges and trial judges to sit on appeals panels.”

http://www.nytimes.com/1998/06/13/nyregion/gop-its-eyes-on-high-court-blocks-a-judge.html?fta=y&pagewanted=all


19 posted on 05/27/2009 8:22:47 AM PDT by dervish (I'm the President see me bow (at 0:50) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S60U-hl35Gw)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lormand

bump


20 posted on 05/27/2009 8:23:13 AM PDT by hoosiermama (Berg is a liberal democrat. Keyes is a conservative. Obama is bringing us together already!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-47 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson