Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Homosexuals more likely to molest kids, study reports
http://www.sbcbaptistpress.org ^ | May 30, 2001 | By Ken Walker

Posted on 05/26/2009 3:03:25 PM PDT by Maelstorm

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-51 next last
To: Maelstorm

DUUUHHHHHHH!
This “study” was funded by a $2 million grant from the Department of Homosexual Sensitivity and Dairy Queen Corporation.

I believe it was the early Romans who prohibited several classes of people from holding public office: Those of illegitimate birth (bastards), eunuchs and homosexuals.

While these children had no choice in the matter, bastards were prohibited because, having no sense of their family past or history, they could not be trusted to operate for the good of the culture based on its history or traditions.

Eunuchs (castrated males) and homosexuals because they could not and/or would not sire children and would, therefore, most likely have no abiding interest in preserving the culture for future generations.

While there are a number of exceptions, I’ll let YOU tell me what sort of folks we have in public office HERE.

I suspect America has employed technology to compress into slightly over 240 years what it took the Romans over 2,000 to achieve — total and utter collapse.

While channel-surfing recently, I stopped for a moment on an Animal Planet show featuring two lesbian roommates. And, no, they were NOT in the bedroom. As I watched them, I began pondering the question of the growing impact of homosexuals and radical feminists on our culture.

None of these thoughts are original to me and all have been written about and discussed ad nauseam. This little rant is really an exercise in catharsis.

At the individual level, I have personally known a few homosexuals and, in general, have found them to be quiet, respectful and intelligent. There are exceptions – such as the moron homo cited below — but I haven’t personally met them and probably won’t.

Having said that, I fear that the homosexual – and the recent politically correct fervor to further legitimize that lifestyle – has done irreparable harm to our NATIONAL life and what remains of what many of us still call Western European Culture. When that impact is coupled with the rise of radical feminism, the product is a result from which the West may never recover.
Allow me to explain:

The simple physiological fact is that homosexuals CANNOT reproduce. The current population replacement rate – the rate necessary to maintain the current native born population level — for the United States is somewhere north of 2 children per couple. Homosexuals don’t HAVE kids. Add the radical feminist impact – which holds that motherhood is some form of slavery and has driven many women to seek “fulfillment” OUTSIDE the home — and the current birth rate here is disturbingly FAR BELOW 2.1 per couple.

The other side of the demographic coin is that the virtually unrestrained immigration policies of past administrations have brought a huge influx of people from cultures radically different from that which existed here prior to the advent of PC, diversity, tolerance and all the other names by which many now call these self, nation and culture destroying behaviors. Add the millions and millions of illegals who are now placing such a physical and economic burden on the healthcare and school systems that natural born citizens are being taxed to death and/or cannot, themselves, get the services to which they would otherwise be entitled and it’s a recipe for chaos. And the politicians – who hope these new welfare recipients will support their perpetual reelection — turn a blind eye.

And as these groups agitate and campaign for THEIR particular flavor of diversity and tolerance, they also give added traction to virtually EVERY OTHER flavor. As they change millions of minds and cause others to reconsider long-standing and time-tested value systems, they are turning our world upside down.

The effect of these factors is that the America in which many of us older folks grew up is disappearing at an alarming rate. As the nation many of us came to love – and donned uniforms to defend – drifts toward some sort of Balkanized
Despotism, large segments of these new arrivals – who know little and care less of the traditions, values and history of this place and even refuse to learn the common tongue — separate themselves into ghetto-like enclaves where outsiders are often not welcomed unless they’re spending money. We run the very serious risk of repeating the experiences of the former Yugoslavia from which some of my people came.

Speaking of whom, my great-great grandparents waited for years then stood in long lines at Ellis Island to be deloused, interrogated and told they had to learn English and our history and traditions and pass a test – something the Hispanics and radical Muslim terrorists strolling across the border with Mexico don’ t have to do.

The Clinton administration – well known for its tolerance of the gay lifestyle – published some statistics in connection with AIDS that startled many. Of course, the PC then rearing its ugly head prohibited all but the brave from commenting on any of that.

The CDC statistics showed that 85% of all AIDS/HIV cases are
1. Active, non-monogamous homosexuals,
(the largest subset)
2. Heterosexuals and bisexuals who have had sex with group 1 and
3. IV drug abusers who share needles.
(Kinda gives new meaning to Romans 6:23, doesn’t it?)
The remaining 15% are those who have contracted AIDS via other,
non-sexual/non-drug means SUCH AS TRANSFUSIONS OF TAINTED BLOOD (which one homosexual “leader” on the West Coast URGED his fellow homosexuals to CONTINUE to attempt to contaminate in order to involve the straight community in the push to increase federal funding for AIDS research).

So, with the population replacement rate practically down to zero, we have the “leaders” of the homosexual community – who can do nothing to help raise that rate – encouraging their members to make ill or kill those of us who have and/or are having and raising kids here.

I find it fascinating that many members of the homosexual community and the radical feminists are on the front line of the assault on traditional values and seek to replace them with more tolerance, diversity and other politically correct nonsense. They have succeeded beyond their wildest dreams.

While their activities have produced short-term benefits for them, that diversity, tolerance and egalitarianism have also opened the door to the idea that no culture is “better” than any other. Obama – apparently having confused Chicago with America — spent days recently apologizing to everyone he met for our defective, decadent and corrupt culture.

And that has brought to our shores a formerly foreign culture, the more radical elements of which are breeding at a rate well in excess of the rate among the indigenous population.

And, just as it already has in Great Britain and continental Europe, with those increasing numbers will come increased political and social power.

And with that will surely come a foreign theology and law system.

And that foreign theology – that’s be Islam— and law system – that’s be Sharia — DOES NOT TOLERATE HOMOSEXUALITY and regards WOMEN AS CHATTEL WHO HAVE NO PERSONAL RIGHTS LET ALONE THE SORT OF FREEDOM TO WHICH THE FEMINISTS ARE ACCUSTOMED.

The bottom line, gays and ladies?
You will:
1. fall under the headsman’s sword and/or
2. be confined to the house unless your man wants to take you somewhere, but only if you are garbed from head to toe. Did I mention that a man can probably rape and/or kill you and suffer no penalty?

So there you have it.

I’d urge you to think about these things while there MIGHT still be time to alter course.

PS: I had to get this out of my system BEFORE the new, improved congress passes the pending legislation making it a crime to post ANYTHING on the web that could in any way cause ANYONE emotional distress. Would it matter that it was factual? Nope! While it’s probable that the Supremes will rule it a violation of the First Amendment, I’d rather not squander my kids’ small inheritance on lawyers bringing the case.


21 posted on 05/26/2009 3:30:52 PM PDT by Dick Bachert ( th)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Maelstorm

This’ll go over like flatus in church when reported in California, Massachusetts, Vermont, and Iowa.


22 posted on 05/26/2009 3:30:58 PM PDT by vetvetdoug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Maelstorm

And how much did this incredible study cost?


23 posted on 05/26/2009 3:33:21 PM PDT by mowowie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rannug
Nor in mine, either.

Funny this study came out today. We have a queer in our office that got into the debate of pedophila and he was offended by my statement of "Not all homosexuals are pedophiles, but almost all pedophiles are homosexuals".

I'll have to bring this article to him tommorrow.

Oh, and queer means, odd, peculiar behavior BTW ;).

24 posted on 05/26/2009 3:33:48 PM PDT by DCBryan1 (Arm Pilots&Teachers. Build the Wall. Export Illegals. Profile Muslims. Execute child molesters RFN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: donna
Human sexuality, especially male sexuality, is polymorphous...

Nope...sorry...does not compute.Can guys be sexual "pigs"? Yah.More than a few are unfaithful and many of those who aren't are at least tempted.But if you're "doing" one or more women you *do not* turn around and start doing boys at the same time.Can such a guy be sick enough to "do" girls at the same time? Maybe.But not boys.

25 posted on 05/26/2009 3:39:12 PM PDT by Gay State Conservative (Christian+Veteran=Terrorist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Maelstorm

Other than the fact that they vote dem, where do the homos get so much power.


26 posted on 05/26/2009 3:50:20 PM PDT by umgud (Look to gov't to solve your everday problems and they'll control your everday life.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Maelstorm

The author of this report would be IMPRISONED in Great Britain under their hate speech laws!

You can be prosecuted there for just criticizing homosexuality, even if you do it a rational and measured way. So this little report is pure heresy.


27 posted on 05/26/2009 3:52:39 PM PDT by Wil H (The most destructive act of Muslim terrorism against the US was paying for 0bama's Harvard education)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gay State Conservative
I liked the following quote:

"Heterosexual men were responsible for 74 percent of assaults on male victims

Which was the quoted author's way of blaming "heterosexuals" for the problem of assaulting young boys. It seems to me that using the term "heterosexual" in that case is a complete misuse of the language. They're raping OTHER males. They are at least bisexual, or misclassified heteros. Either way, the problem is obvious to anyone who's not a liberal.

28 posted on 05/26/2009 3:54:43 PM PDT by Hardastarboard (I long for the days when advertisers didn't constantly ask about the health of my genital organs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Maelstorm
I don't care if you are homosexual or bisexual - if you are taking care of children you need to be vetted and subjected to the same investigation as anyone else. "Child abuse knows no gender boundaries."

And those in charge of this foster care program have still learned nothing. Just too brain addled by PCness, I suppose, but the entire article is from a point-of-view that gays were considered the safest foster carers, almost as if being gay or bi was an additional, and very positive qualification.

Just nuts, and out of touch with reality. This brings to mind the two children in the UK who were given for adoption to two gays over their grandparents.

29 posted on 05/26/2009 3:55:22 PM PDT by Will88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: umgud

They are tools of change used by the powers that be to separate and break down tradition.

Homosexuals have their own deep purse to fund all these causes. This purse is funded by a fairly low key orgnaisation whose name escapes me for the moment. Remember they also have had decades of Aids and other government funding. These guys are POWerful and they own the media.


30 posted on 05/26/2009 4:01:19 PM PDT by Chickensoup ("Patriotism is supporting your country all the time, and your government when it deserves it.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: umgud

They are tighter than the freemasons. Gays look out for gays, which is why industries get penetrated, and then dominated, by gays.

BTW, no puns whatsoever were intended in the above paragraph, which itself is a statement to how badly even our lexicon has been damaged by homosexuality.

Another thing - gays don’t have kids, and don’t have spouses, per se, which means they have tons of disposable income and a singular focus on career. Nevermind they gut the culture without contributing to it (check out the replacement birthrate if you doubt that last fact).

GLT are net consumers in a society - net liabilities. Since they can’t contribute chidren, or families for those children, and since they also pose a direct threat to the same (pedophilia), the completely take without giving.


31 posted on 05/26/2009 4:02:39 PM PDT by RinaseaofDs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Maelstorm

“Heterosexual men were responsible for 74 percent of assaults on male victim.....”

I’m sorry, males who sexually assault males or minor males for that matter are homosexuals.


32 posted on 05/26/2009 4:15:51 PM PDT by headstamp 2 (Spay or Neuter your liberal today!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gay State Conservative

You are talking about things that are only sins in our Judeo/Christian culture. The rest of the world believes differently. This is our future as we leave Christianity behind.


33 posted on 05/26/2009 4:30:32 PM PDT by donna (Gasoline usage: Demand dropped 9.6% in 2008; total decline from 2005 thru 2008 was 28%)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: vetvetdoug
In Massachusetts gay marriage was forced on the state by the supreme court. We organized and gather more signatures for a referendum than any other in the history of our state.

The official number of citizens who signed were staggering and did not include many thousands of signatures the state would not allow ( ones signature had to fit inside a tiny box, any part of the signature outside the box was disqualified).

The state had to ratify the signatures, a formality, according to our state constitution. Instead of doing so the damned Democrats of Beacon Hill just ignored it. We went through the process legally and were basically told to take a hike. Even our Gov. Patrick urged the politicians not to ratify this. Of course, later his own daughter of 18 or 19 comes out of the closet.

34 posted on 05/26/2009 4:31:30 PM PDT by warsaw44
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

Such is the Gaystopo - Prepare for the Gaystopo backlash and denials of the facts.


35 posted on 05/26/2009 4:40:34 PM PDT by SandRat (Duty, Honor, Country! What else needs said?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Maelstorm

The first “Gay Rights” protest in the United States was organized, in part, by a pedophile.

NAMBLA, the National Man Boy Love Association is involved in several “gay rights” parades around the country.


36 posted on 05/26/2009 5:05:06 PM PDT by Kansas58
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Maelstorm

The first “Gay Rights” protest in the United States was organized, in part, by a pedophile.

NAMBLA, the National Man Boy Love Association is involved in several “gay rights” parades around the country.


37 posted on 05/26/2009 5:05:09 PM PDT by Kansas58
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PC99

The number of Catholic Priests involved in sexual abuse cases is less than 5% of the total number of Priests.

I wish, however, that the Church had the same policy as the Boy Scouts.

The Church goes to court for letting homosexuals into the Priesthood.

The Boy Scouts go to court for keeping homosexuals out.


38 posted on 05/26/2009 5:07:48 PM PDT by Kansas58
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Maelstorm

This is a long read, but worth the time:

http://www.amicusveritas.org/AMPLP/freethesailor/index.htm


39 posted on 05/26/2009 5:16:25 PM PDT by Kansas58
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Maelstorm

Duh!

http://folsomstreetfair.org/photos/


40 posted on 05/26/2009 5:23:11 PM PDT by roses of sharon (NOTRE DAMIAN: ABORTION, YES WE CAN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-51 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson