I have no doubt she had serious hurdles in her life, probably more so, especially given the time she started her career, then if it was a White person in her position.
I even have no doubt she has the experience to be on SCOTUS. But it is her judicial philosophy which is not rooted in the Constitution but in “emotion”, “fairness”, and “social justice”. She believes in being a Judicial Legislator and that should simply be a total dis-qualifier right there.
There are a lot off Jurists out their with fantastic American stories to tell, but that does not make them qualified to sit on the SCOTUS, regardless of how much “empathy” is welled up inside them.
Disregard period between Social Justice and She. Should be an and.
“I feel the same way. If a prospective employer asked a question like that I would feel at the very least it was highly inappropriate and unprofessional.”
And that attitude is why men still generally mistrust women is such workplaces. When an applicant is sitting in judgement of the potential employer, with her “offended” radar set to high, it is exactly the wrong attitude. who wants to work around someone like that? Its known as “having a chip on you shoulder”.
Nobody wants a feminista commissar for a new employee.