Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: spikeytx86
“But it is her judicial philosophy which is not rooted in the Constitution but in “emotion”, “fairness”, and “social justice”. She believes in being a Judicial Legislator and that should simply be a total dis-qualifier right there.”

Disregard period between Social Justice and She. Should be an and.

45 posted on 05/26/2009 3:41:51 PM PDT by spikeytx86 (Pray for Democrats for they have been brainwashed by their fruity little club.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies ]


To: spikeytx86

And try this on guys. Im just a simple man, but its pretty obvious what really happened. Here were the questions:

“Do law firms do a disservice by hiring minority students who the firms know do not have the necessary credentials and will then fire in three to four years? (HINT)

Would I have been admitted to the law school if I were not a Puerto Rican? (again, HUGE HINT)

Was I culturally deprived?” (HINT)

Like i said, im a simple man,, could it be *remotely* possible that they were trying to send her, and others of her ilk a rather clear message? As in the affirmative action train just came to the end of the line. If you are thinking of working here, we will flush you in an instant if you aren’t top quality.

She considered their offer, and knowing the truth about herself, indignantly refused to work there. The firm laughed all the way to the bank, at having deflected types like her, used to special treatment due to skin color or plumbing.


48 posted on 05/26/2009 4:03:56 PM PDT by DesertRhino (Dogs earn the title of "man's best friend", Muslims hate dogs,,add that up.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson