To: andy58-in-nh
I dropped the WSJ for the IBD at the first of the year.
3rd Q of the WSJ was nothing but a echo chamber for DemocRat talking points.
48 posted on
05/26/2009 5:51:59 AM PDT by
MrB
(Go Galt now, Bowman later)
To: MrB
That's what I found, too. The WSJ's news coverage is as liberally-slanted as the Washington Post's. It's not quite as bad as the New York Times, but then again: who is? The Journal's editorial page and op-ed section is its only saving grace. By way of contrast, IBD doesn't appear to hire wooly-headed J-Schoool graduates but relies instead on business reporting by people who actually understand (and do not hate) business.
53 posted on
05/26/2009 5:57:55 AM PDT by
andy58-in-nh
(You have enemies? Good. That means you've stood up for something, sometime in your life.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson