[[The fact that our physics can’t describe some of the things we observe tells me that we’ve got something wrong. It tells other people that there are invisible universes and they can only be described using mathematics that don’t work in practice. Fairies and toadstools anyone?]]
Actually, if htis fella is right, it can be evidenced, measured, and calculated, and it agrees with hte calculations:
“Standing waves imply the matter had an outer edge for the shock waves to rebound from. That would make the geometric centre be a centre of mass also. If we put those boundary conditions (an edge and centre) into Einstein’s equations of general relativity, we get the cosmology I presented in Starlight and Time. The centre of mass is a centre for gravitational forces, low in intensity but cosmic in extent. Then gravity causes large time dilation effects at the centre during one particular stage of the expansion.
Thus quantized redshifts are observational evidence for my cosmology, bearing out my preliminary claim in 1994:
‘In particular, the “quantized” distribution of galactic red shifts,3,22observed by various astronomers seems to contradict the Copernican principle and all cosmologies founded on it— including the big bang. But the effect seems to have a ready explanation in terms of my new non-Copernican “white hole” cosmology.’53 “
But apparently, this fella, according to some like Tolsti, this fella is nothign but a “Hater of science”- so any evidence he may come up with- regardless of how well it adheres to calculations and scientific observations, must be thrown out hte window apparently because it implies a designer-
All this talk of “fudge factor” and “dark matter” reminds me of the time I was stuck in an elevator when I needed to have a bowel movement really bad and I am reminded the difference between theory and reality isn’t as sweet as some would think.