BTW, my comments were not accurate, and I am sorry for that.
I remembered him coming up with decisions that would result in the detainees getting access to our courts. When I said what I did to you, it was based on that remembrance.
It wasn’t accurate to state that he advocated for access. I believe it would have been more accurate to state that his polices would have facilitated that access, despite his vocal objects to that access.
I should have address this in my response to you, and didn’t.
I have enjoyed our debate. No hard feeling toward you personally, I just disagree with your logic.
Stay safe....