Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Gay U.S. Diplomats to Get Equal Benefits
News Max ^ | May 20, 2009 | Staff

Posted on 05/22/2009 3:45:56 AM PDT by IbJensen

WASHINGTON – Secretary of State Hillary Clinton has promised to provide equal benefits to partners of homosexual U.S. diplomats stationed overseas, a congressman said Wednesday.

Rep. Howard Berman, head of the House Foreign Affairs Committee, had sought to require the State Department to offer benefits such as medical care, transport between postings and security training to partners regardless of sexual orientation.

(Excerpt) Read more at newsmax.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: bho44; bhohomosexualagenda; bhostatedept; culturalmeltdown; homosexualagenda; moralabsolutes
How generous of Hillary to spend more money the US doesn't have to take care of perverts who shouldn't be in the diplomatic corps in the first place!

How many queers do we have representing America's 'values' abroad?

1 posted on 05/22/2009 3:45:56 AM PDT by IbJensen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: IbJensen

Post them to Saudi Arabia.


2 posted on 05/22/2009 3:46:52 AM PDT by Izzy Dunne (Hello, I'm a TAGLINE virus. Please help me spread by copying me into YOUR tag line.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: IbJensen

Glad she has such a huge budget to take care of this for her employees. /s


3 posted on 05/22/2009 3:51:25 AM PDT by autumnraine (Freedom's just another word for nothing left to lose- Kris Kristoferrson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: IbJensen

This is rich. Right now, my company (multinational Fortune 250) is underway with a program to force me to document that my dependents are legally mine - birth and marriage certificates, tax returns; I dunno there may be DNA testing in the fine print.

But these folks just have to say they are doing the “tube steak boogie” with each other and they are good to go?

Wow!


4 posted on 05/22/2009 3:54:42 AM PDT by don-o (My son, Ben - Marine Private First Class - 1/16/09 - Parris Island, SC)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Izzy Dunne

You read my mind!!


5 posted on 05/22/2009 3:56:14 AM PDT by FES0844
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Izzy Dunne

Or the Swat Valley of Pakistan. (just kidding).....


6 posted on 05/22/2009 3:58:23 AM PDT by AmericanInTokyo (2010 is American People's last chance to stop "Seig Heil" & to "right" things. What will they do?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Izzy Dunne

Exactly.
Send some flaming fag who is flamboyant and who is an especially proud Christian to boot.


7 posted on 05/22/2009 4:04:15 AM PDT by Joe Boucher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: don-o

This is just another pat on the back for practicing perversion while ‘serving’ in the diplomatic corps.


8 posted on 05/22/2009 4:07:20 AM PDT by IbJensen (If Catholics voted based upon the teachings of the church, there would be no abortion and no Obomba.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: autumnraine
She is, after all, the Secretary of Steak.

Just look how her corpulence has mushroomed since taking her important office.

This is truly what Americans deserve: having Hillary desecrate this office.

9 posted on 05/22/2009 4:09:18 AM PDT by IbJensen (If Catholics voted based upon the teachings of the church, there would be no abortion and no Obomba.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: IbJensen

Absolutely ridiculous. But, then, it IS Hillary...


10 posted on 05/22/2009 4:24:31 AM PDT by PubliusMM (RKBA; a matter of fact, not opinion. 01-20-2013: Change we can look forward to.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: IbJensen
Queers don't have broads.

Unless you want to include what's'ername ... Uma? Hillary's squeeze.

11 posted on 05/22/2009 4:26:49 AM PDT by knarf (I say things that are true ... I have no proof ... but they're true)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: knarf
Hillary loves to kiss hair-legged, shaggy-armpitted wives of Arabs.

One can only wonder if her live-in lesbo pal shaves.

12 posted on 05/22/2009 4:31:25 AM PDT by IbJensen (If Catholics voted based upon the teachings of the church, there would be no abortion and no Obomba.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Izzy Dunne
My thought exactly.

We shall see just how “multicultural” we are. . .you know, no culture is better than another, that we have no right to impose our standards on another culture. . .this is a situation where two liberal religious dogma clash-—multiculturalism and homosexuality.

“What, you mean I can't be posted to Saudi? Because I am a homo?! That's discrimination! I will sue!”

or

“You can't post me to Saudi, I am a homo and they will kill me and my sweetie! I will sue!”

13 posted on 05/22/2009 4:39:41 AM PDT by Hulka
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: don-o
This is rich. Right now, my company (multinational Fortune 250) is underway with a program to force me to document that my dependents are legally mine - birth and marriage certificates, tax returns; I dunno there may be DNA testing in the fine print. But these folks just have to say they are doing the “tube steak boogie” with each other and they are good to go? Wow!

I agree. This is the new america.


14 posted on 05/22/2009 5:25:11 AM PDT by New Perspective (Proud father of a 5 year old son with Down Syndrome. He's a wonderful gift.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: New Perspective

Is that Rudy Guliani on the left? He’s done himself up similarly before.


15 posted on 05/22/2009 5:28:45 AM PDT by onedoug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: IbJensen

I think that would require a change in the law to accomplish. Clinton is promising something she can’t necessarily deliver.


16 posted on 05/22/2009 5:29:52 AM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: IbJensen

Things like this create new terrorists that want to destroy us, not waterboarding.


17 posted on 05/22/2009 5:40:23 AM PDT by mikey_hates_everything
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: IbJensen
State has been accommodating partners for quite sometime. One of the problems Administrative Officers face is when the State employee changes partners... The question then becomes one of whether the current partner is entitled to transportation, housing, employement, etc. What constitutes a long term relationship and would marriage be accepted a valid document between two men or two women issued by a State that recognizes such unions.

The Department will have to issue a Foreign Affairs Manual revision and a Foreign Affairs Regualtion giving broad guidance to Administrative Officers and Human Resources on making determinations for this legal benefit. I for one wonder if and when a relationship not legally binding becomes situationally deserving of what are now considered benefits for spouses and legal dependents.

The real kicker here is whether a partner is entitled to traditionally legally dividable benefits once a breakup occurs, e.g., would a partner be entitled to demand 50% of retirment? The longterm legal implementations of "giving" consideration open legal doors to entitlements. And if so, is this enforceable upon the individual or by the Governement; State is government at the end of the day just like any other type of employment - it is those who pay the taxes that ultimately OWE entitlements.

Can the Secretary of State legally obligate the US Government for unfunded expenditures? Now that is a question for the Congress!

18 posted on 05/22/2009 6:23:56 AM PDT by Jumper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: IbJensen
How many queers do we have representing America's 'values' abroad?

Well, starting at the top... at least one.

19 posted on 05/22/2009 6:28:01 AM PDT by erman (Outside of a dog, a book is man's best companion. Inside of a dog, it's too dark to read.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jumper
DRAFT INTERNAL RELEASE
 For Review
 Today, I am pleased to announce that the Department of State will be extending a number of benefits and allowances to domestic partners of members of the Foreign Service assigned abroad. 

 While a career in the Foreign Service is rewarding, the demands to serve our country both at home and abroad also require great sacrifice by our Foreign Service personnel and their families as well. Family members often must uproot their lives, endure hardship conditions, and put their own careers on hold. Like all families, our Foreign Service families come in different configurations; all are part of the common fabric of our Post communities abroad. 

 Historically, domestic partners of Foreign Service members have not been provided the same training, benefits, allowances, and protections that other family members receive. These inequities are unfair and must end. Providing training, medical care, and other benefits to domestic partners promote the cohesiveness, safety, and effectiveness of our Posts abroad. It will also help the Department attract and retain personnel in a competitive environment where domestic partner benefits and allowances are increasingly the norm for world-class employers. At bottom, the Department will provide these benefits for both opposite-sex and same-sex domestic partners because it is the right thing to do. 
 The Department will be exercising its inherent authority to change its regulations in the Foreign Affairs Manual and Department of State Standardized Regulations to allow the domestic partners of Department Foreign Service personnel to qualify as family members for a variety of benefits and allowances. Where appropriate, this extension of benefits and allowances will apply to the children of domestic partners as well. To qualify for these benefits and allowances, an employee must file an affidavit identifying his or her domestic partner and certifying to certain eligibility requirements that will be set forth in the FAM.

 The Department of State intends to provide the following additional benefits and allowances for declared domestic partners of eligible employees serving overseas:
 · Diplomatic passports,

 · Inclusion on employee travel orders to and from posts abroad,

 · Shipment of household effects,

 · Inclusion in family size calculations for the purpose of making housing allocations,
 · Family member preference for employment at posts abroad,

 · Use of medical facilities at posts abroad,

 · Medical evacuation from posts abroad,

 · Emergency travel for the partners to visit gravely ill or injured employees,

 · Inclusion as family members for emergency evacuation from posts abroad,

 · Subsistence payments related to emergency evacuation from posts abroad,

 · Inclusion in calculations of payments of overseas differentials and allowances (e.g., payment for quarters, cost of living, and other allowances), · Representation expenses, and

 · Training at the Foreign Service Institute.

 The Department also will work with our inter-agency partners and host country governments to provide domestic partners with diplomatic visas, appropriate diplomatic and consular privileges and immunities, and authorization to work in the local economy abroad. 

 We look forward to implementing these changes.
20 posted on 05/25/2009 5:35:01 AM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson