Sorry...it looked good. But the facts just aren't there.
It’s been posted several times here but doesn’t appear to have the least amount of validity.
Americans for Freedom of Information don’t appear to exist. Just a nasty attack on anyone seeking info.
april 1? fools day
April 1, 2009
The story is dated April 1st, that should tell you something.
New tag line.
This clown needs to leave post haste...regardless of his Birf Certifikate. He is a waster in the truest Atlas Shrugged sense.
You know, put it out on April 1st, throw in a couple of loose facts and it makes the whole concept of the BC issue look conspiratorial.
/tinfoil hat - wishful thinking
This keeps popping up tonight but the source disappears....
I saw the earlier thread by a newbie and the link wouldn’t work so I thought it might not be true.
I got this as a forward and almost fell over thinking it was true. I had heard Occidental was served with a subpoena to release Obama’s college records awhile ago. I went to USJF website and there were articles but not about these college records. Then I googled and someone was actually named as the hoax writer of the email. The reason I checked is because this was too big to not hear about either here or elsewhere. And it was casually being forwarded and not many saying anything about it.
I do not think this factcheck article is totally true. I offer this one article as a maybe the Occidental records were requested. And I may have other information on the rest of it that fectcheck says is untrue.
http://www.sonorannews.com/archives/2009/090225/frntpgObama.html
Attorney Gary Kreep with the United States Justice Foundation, a public interest law firm, who is representing Keyes, served Occidental College with a subpoena for Obama’s records.
Occidental’s lawyer, Stuart W. Rudnick of Musick, Peeler & Garrett, faxed the subpoena to Obama’s Attorney Frederic D. Woocher of Strumwasser & Woocher, acknowledging it appeared valid on its face and the college would have no choice other than to comply with the subpoena absent a court instructing otherwise.
Woocher subsequently contacted Kreep regarding the subpoena, stating, “It will likely not surprise you to hear that President-elect Obama opposes production of the requested records,” and asked whether he would be willing to agree to voluntarily cancel or withdraw the subpoena.
If it became necessary instead to file a motion to quash to the subpoena and Obama prevailed, Woocher said full monetary sanctions would be sought.
In reaction to these events, Keyes posted on his blog, “It confirms the common sense suspicion that he won’t act forthrightly in this matter because he has something to hide.”
Now I am headed to see if Keyes did post about this.
urban myth, sadly.
I’m amazed at how many gullible people fall for that old April Fool’s prank.
Pretty clever hoax. If only...
Here is a lawsuit obama’s attorneys are suppose to answer June 21st. Apuzzo is suing everyone who failed to properly vet obama, including Cheney.
http://puzo1.blogspot.com/2009/04/more-delays-usaobama-say-they-need-124.html
Whether or not the President of the United States is eligible for the Office he currently occupies is of utmost national importance. Every passing day Mr. Obama takes executive action that significantly impacts on the lives of Americans. The USA and Obama have already been granted one extension to answer to May 5, 2009. They have therefore been given 77 days to answer. This is enough time for them to answer. With an extension to June 21, 2009, USA and Obama are asking for 124 days and the Congressional defendants are asking for 117 days to answer. Court rules only allow them 60 days. Such delay is not in the national interest and not acceptable. As to the Congressional defendants, a twenty-day extension for them to answer is reasonable, making their answer due by May 18, 2009. Given the national importance of the issues, an extension for all defendants to answer by June 21, 2009 is not acceptable.
Where’s the “not this sh*t again” guy when you need him?
Good old factcheck.org, one of 0’s foils and defenders.
April 1, 2009