Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Britain rules: Pringles are potato chips
upi ^ | May 21, 2009

Posted on 05/21/2009 1:49:20 PM PDT by NYer

An appeals court in Britain said Wednesday that Procter and Gamble's snack treat Pringles were, technically, potato chips and subject to sales tax.

The ruling has a potential to require the company to pay $155 million in back taxes and $31 million per year, but a Procter and Gamble spokesperson said prior arrangements with Her Majesty's Revenue and Customs meant there were no back taxes due, The Daily Telegraph reported.

Foods are rarely subject to sales tax in Britain, but potato chips happen to be singled out as an exception.

The court heard arguments on whether or not Pringles, made 42 percent from potato and 33 percent from fat and flour, contained enough "potatoness," to be considered a potato chip, or crisp.

The court decided there was "more than enough potato content for it to be a reasonable view that it is made from potato," the Telegraph said.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; Government; Political Humor/Cartoons
KEYWORDS: britain; potatoes; pringles; uk
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-42 next last
To: Publius6961

The reason, of course, is to make sure the consumer forgets about just how much sales tax (17.5% in the UK) The Man is taking...


21 posted on 05/21/2009 2:25:21 PM PDT by MikeGranby
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: NYer

Pathetic that a once great nation is reduced to arguing the great philosophical issue of “what is a potato chip”. No wonder the west is vulnerable to attacks of all sorts.


22 posted on 05/21/2009 2:35:04 PM PDT by Anima Mundi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYer

Ketchup is a vegetable!


23 posted on 05/21/2009 3:25:04 PM PDT by BradyLS (DO NOT FEED THE BEARS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Publius6961
I hate it when they do that! What's the other 25%?

Hype/sizzle.

24 posted on 05/21/2009 3:26:50 PM PDT by BradyLS (DO NOT FEED THE BEARS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: NYer

This reminds me of the story “Pigs is Pigs”.

http://www.gutenberg.org/files/2004/2004-h/2004-h.htm


25 posted on 05/21/2009 4:45:42 PM PDT by GreenLanternCorps ("Barack Obama" is Swahili for "Jimmy Carter".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MikeGranby
True enough, but in the UK prices for consumers must be quoted including sales tax...

Sleazy cowards in Parliament don't want people to realize how heavy their tax burden is, eh?

26 posted on 05/21/2009 6:48:45 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum (Islam is a religion of peace, and Muslims reserve the right to kill anyone who says otherwise.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: AH_LiveRight
Just as I suspected. 25% buttfunk.

That last 25% is the love that holds the Pringle together.

27 posted on 05/21/2009 8:09:45 PM PDT by RansomOttawa (tm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Yes but obviously the manufacturer doesnt want to have that sales tax slapped on their product, as that will make it more expensive and therefore less attractive to customers. Therefore they will sell less of them and therefore they will make less profit from them.


28 posted on 05/22/2009 2:58:22 AM PDT by Vanders9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: sportutegrl

“Crisps” are what the Brits call “chips”.


29 posted on 05/22/2009 2:59:30 AM PDT by Vanders9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Anima Mundi
Pathetic that a once great nation is reduced to arguing the great philosophical issue of “what is a potato chip”. No wonder the west is vulnerable to attacks of all sorts.

I am not sure that we are in any place to criticize the Brits on that particular angle, seeing as our Supreme Court has ruled on such things as whether a tomato is a vegetable or a fruit (it decided the tomato was a vegetable for purposes of imposing taxes):

Mr. Justice GRAY, after stating the facts in the foregoing language, delivered the opinion of the court.

The single question in this case is whether tomatoes, considered as provisions, are to be classed as 'vegetables' or as 'fruit,' within the meaning of the tariff act of 1883.

The only witnesses called at the trial testified that neither 'vegetables' nor 'fruit' had any special meaning in trade or commerce different from that given in the dictionaries, and that they had the same meaning in trade to-day that they had in March, 1883.

The passages cited from the dictionaries define the word 'fruit' as the seed of plaints, or that part of plaints which contains the seed, and especially the juicy, pulpy products of certain plants, covering and containing the seed. These definitions have no tendency to show that tomatoes are 'fruit,' as distinguished from 'vegetables,' in common speech, or within the meaning of the tariff act.

There being no evidence that the words 'fruit' and 'vegetables' have acquired any special meaning in trade or commerce, they must receive their ordinary meaning. Of that [149 U.S. 304, 307] meaning the court is bound to take judicial notice, as it does in regard to all words in our own tongue; and upon such a question dictionaries are admitted, not as evidence, but only as aids to the memory and understanding of the court. Brown v. Piper, 91 U.S. 37 , 42; Jones v. U. S ., 137 U.S. 202, 216 , 11 S. Sup. Ct. Rep. 80; Nelson v. Cushing, 2 Cush. 519, 532, 533; Page v. Fawcet, 1 Leon. 242; Tayl. Ev. (8th Ed.) 16, 21.

Botanically speaking, tomatoes are the fruit of a vine, just as are cucumbers, squashes, beans, and peas. But in the common language of the people, whether sellers or consumers of provisions, all these are vegetables which are grown in kitchen gardens, and which, whether eaten cooked or raw, are, like potatoes, carrots, parsnips, turnips, beets, cauliflower, cabbage, celery, and lettuce, usually served at dinner in, with, or after the soup, fish, or meats which constitute the principal part of the repast, and not, like fruits generally, as dessert.

The attempt to class tomatoes as fruit is not unlike a recent attempt to class beans as seeds, of which Mr. Justice Bradley, speaking for this court, said: 'We do not see why they should be classified as seeds, any more than walnuts should be so classified. Both are seeds, in the language of botany or natural history, but not in commerce nor in common parlance. On the other hand in speaking generally of provisions, beans may well be included under the term 'vegetables.' As an article of food on our tables, whether baked or boiled, or forming the basis of soup, they are used as a vegetable, as well when ripe as when green. This is the principal use to which they are put. Beyond the common knowledge which we have on this subject, very little evidence is necessary, or can be produced.' Robertson v. Salomon, 130 U.S. 412, 414 , 9 S. Sup. Ct. Rep. 559.

Judgment affirmed.

NIX v. HEDDEN, 149 U.S. 304 (1893)


30 posted on 05/22/2009 3:10:26 AM PDT by snowsislander (NRA -- join today! 1-877-NRA-2000)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: NYer

What a bunch of f’ing idiots. If it is a chip (a flake; a slice; A small broken or cut off piece) from a potato, then it is a potato chip. Pringles are not potato chips. Anybody, like me, who loves potato chips knows that. If anything, they are a potato chip substitute. They’re not bad, but in no way do they have those desirable features that only real potato chips have.


31 posted on 05/22/2009 3:28:59 AM PDT by csense
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Vanders9
Sales tax shouldn't be incorporated into the price anyway.

It should be separated out so the peasants can know just how much their government overlords are stealing from them.

32 posted on 05/22/2009 6:25:10 AM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum (Islam is a religion of peace, and Muslims reserve the right to kill anyone who says otherwise.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

If im buying something I just want to know how much I have to hand over. I dont want an intimate breakdown of how much of the cost is tax, how much is the retail outlets “cut” (a very proportion incidentally) how much is due to distribution (an even higher proportion) or whatever. I mean, if you buy something they don’t tell you how much import duty is on it.

For the record, many items do have the sales tax declared in the UK. Especially higher value items.


33 posted on 05/23/2009 4:31:51 AM PDT by Vanders9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Vanders9
If im buying something I just want to know how much I have to hand over. I dont want an intimate breakdown of how much of the cost is tax, how much is the retail outlets “cut” (a very proportion incidentally) how much is due to distribution (an even higher proportion) or whatever. I mean, if you buy something they don’t tell you how much import duty is on it.

You must be a very happy peasant.

May your chains rest lightly upon you.

34 posted on 05/23/2009 12:38:03 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum (Islam is a religion of peace, and Muslims reserve the right to kill anyone who says otherwise.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

As opposed to an unhappy one?

You’re in chains as much as me. You just don’t realise it.


35 posted on 05/23/2009 3:12:19 PM PDT by Vanders9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Vanders9
You’re in chains as much as me. You just don’t realise it.

You're the one who is in denial, my friend.

36 posted on 05/23/2009 6:37:20 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum (Islam is a religion of peace, and Muslims reserve the right to kill anyone who says otherwise.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Not so. I know I’m being ripped off.


37 posted on 05/25/2009 2:29:41 PM PDT by Vanders9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Vanders9
Not so. I know I’m being ripped off.

You already said you don't care.

38 posted on 05/26/2009 5:53:02 AM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum (Islam is a religion of peace, and Muslims reserve the right to kill anyone who says otherwise.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

I said I didn’t want a breakdown on every packet. That’s not quite the same thing.


39 posted on 05/26/2009 7:41:31 AM PDT by Vanders9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: null and void

Why am I attracted to the opposite sex? This drives me mad.


40 posted on 11/02/2018 6:24:50 PM PDT by SamAdams76 ( If you are offended by what I have to say here then you can blame your parents for raising a wuss)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-42 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson