Replies

Obama’s past policy was to support the slaughter of any child that happened to accidentally survive an abortion. He may still hold that opinion. I have no reason to believe he doesn’t. So when we’re talking about respectful treatment of him at a religious institution, and him deftly deflecting criticisms, I just have to state that if this doesn’t cause one to feel like puking, not much will.

The Genius of Barack Obama is that he is a half-crazy leftist who talks the talk of a moderate. Obama can get away with it because he has the MSM doing the heavy lifting of bashing the right.

Consequently, when his opponents screech that he is a baby-killing proabort socialist, while he talks about 'fair-minded opponents', they look like crazies and he looks like a bridge-builder.

We have to make people realize that his teleprompter'd words mean nothing. It's his actions (and past votes) that are extreme, dangerous, intemperate, and radical. And wrong.

The power structure of Notre Dame clearly assisted President Obama in his strategy of deception: saying one thing and doing another.

In his Notre Dame speech, Obama endorsed "sensible conscience clauses"--- yet his HHS has abandoned their enforcement of the conscience clauses already passed by Congress (the Church Amendments, Coats Amendment, and the Hyde/Weldon Amendment). Isn't it "sensible" to enforce the conscience measures our elected representatives have approved over the past 35 years? What's wrong here?

In his Notre Dame speech, Obama said we must respect others' convictions, whether they are for or against abortion: yet he will compel pro-life citizens to become accomplices to abortion, by requiring to to finance, through our tax dollars, the very thing we find morally intolerable.

We respect Obama, and he kills babies. He respects us, and he makes us pay for it. What's wrong here?

Again in his Notre Dame speech, Obama said opponents of embryonic stem cell research may be upholding the sacredness of life, "but so are the parents of a child with juvenile diabetes who are convinced that their son's or daughter's hardships can be relieved."

He didn't mention that adult stem cells have shown repeated success, in laboratory trials involving animals, at reversing diabetes, and have even produced functioning, insulin-producing islet cells in humans, while embryonic stem cells have shown no such success.

And at Notre Dame, he gets one of the world's most prestigious Catholic podiums to broadcast his self-serving, factually deficient arguments, and nobody can even challenge him on this. This is "dialog"? This is "exposure to challenging ideas"?

What's wrong here?

Much like people who Mathschusen By Proxy psychopaths. They such good actors that no matter how sick the hcild is under their watch, they are still believed and the people they are victimizing are considered the weirdos.

He sets off the enemy by their constant provocations and then points at them and says "they're crazy," when they try to fight back.

The classic pattern of psychosis. He's going to destroy this country and all the while he'll fool everyone.