To: markomalley
I don’t see a large problem with this as long as it applies to non-citizens. All full Constitutional rights MUST apply to citizens, without exception, but I think exactly which apply to non-citizens can be a matter of statute.
To: Wonder Warthog
All full Constitutional rights MUST apply to citizens, without exception See #45. It's too late.
America -- a great idea, didn't last.
72 posted on
05/21/2009 8:38:22 AM PDT by
Clint Williams
(Read Roto-Reuters -- we're the spinmeisters | America -- a great idea, didn't last.)
To: Wonder Warthog
I don’t see a large problem with this as long as it applies to non-citizens. All full Constitutional rights MUST apply to citizens, without exception, but I think exactly which apply to non-citizens can be a matter of statute.
It's not what this particular plan asks for, it's the slippery slope it would set us on. It wouldn't take too much perverting to have something similar apply to U.S. citizens.
95 posted on
05/21/2009 8:51:46 AM PDT by
reagan_fanatic
(When you put Democrats in charge, stupid things happen)
To: Wonder Warthog
Obama’s homeland security already named conserveratives and veterns as terrorists. He is sympathic towards jihadists. Who is he going after? Let’s see...
To: Wonder Warthog
but what if barrys not a citizen?
209 posted on
05/21/2009 2:34:25 PM PDT by
wiggen
To: Wonder Warthog
“I don’t see a large problem with this as long as it applies to non-citizens. All full Constitutional rights MUST apply to citizens, without exception...”
You should, because it will apply only to citizens.
297 posted on
05/22/2009 8:46:52 AM PDT by
monday
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson