That's how serious and urgent this state budget crunch really is.
Posted on 05/21/2009 6:02:14 AM PDT by Zakeet
Boy oh boy, did California voters show bickering state officials a thing or two with their slam-dunk downing of five out of six financial propositions in Tuesday's voting. As The Ticket reported then, they didn't just say No; they said No way!
In rapid response, first thing Wednesday something called the California Citizens Compensation Commission announced on a 5-1 vote that it had slashed the salaries of the governor, attorney general, controller, all legislators and other top elected state officials by 18%.
That's nearly 20%! Whacked. Because in a democracy top elected officials should share the hard times and pay a price too.
[Snip]
Schwarzenegger and other top officials began immediate meetings on billions in cuts as others across the Golden state began publicly wringing their hands over what was coming.
But the concrete news of the day was the urgent 18% pay slashes by the compensation commission. Now, here's the really small print contained in that well-publicized crisis announcement:
The pay cuts for officials to share the hard times with voters don't take effect for seven months. Not until 2010.
Commission members said their lawyer said the reductions would be impossible to implement during this calendar year. That's how serious and urgent this state budget crunch really is.
(Excerpt) Read more at latimesblogs.latimes.com ...
That's how serious and urgent this state budget crunch really is.
Commission members said their lawyer said the reductions would be impossible to implement during this calendar year. That’s how serious and urgent this state budget crunch really is.
Translation: They need time to figure out how to get past this bump in the road..perhaps “bonuses” for jobs well done?
If the voters had voted for an 18% increase on Tuesday, would the state representatives start the new pay next week or would they have the accountants work overtime to make sure it was started Wednesday morning.
Do you have a good link for the story?
They can afford to keep paying legislators at 100% but they have to issue IOU’s for tax refunds?
thanks!
This puts me on the record as one of those rare birds who actually reads the full article. Thanks.
AND... when crunch time comes (if it does, because I’m pretty sure the baraqq-0-matic money machine will crank out close to $50 billion for California), the 20% “cuts” will merely be a cut of 20% of the INCREASE the bureaucrats were expecting — i.e., they will get 80% of the raise they were hankerin for. You know how government spending goes.
Wow! This reporter is brilliant, isn't he? He should be a rocket scientist with such an amazing knowledge of math.
Let’s see - if they don’t have it already, add a per diem for expenses, free car, free gas - I’m sure these guys won’t take much of a hit.
Personally, I would have like to see Proposition 1F go even farther than “no pay raise in deficit years” for lawmakers. I would have liked a “no salary after budget deadline and until a budget is passed” and no, Assemblyman Sparky, you don’t get the withheld money back after you pass the budget.
“That’s nearly 20%!”
He’s writing for The Millennials, who like their information served up on a silver platter. They spent too much time “multi-tasking” to develop critical thinking skills. Admittedly, the reporter could have been even more helpful if he’d observed “That’s nearly one-fifth!”
" Tee hee. We're not worried, Nancy will save us."
Don’t voters get the picture, it’s all about the money and power.
Nothing will ever get done as long as the voters keep re-electing the same arrogant lying thieves.
BUMP!
You mean the 60% plus voters of morons, leftards, unionists and Hollyweirds of the Kool-Aid state of Kaleeforneea?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.