Replies

Thanks shibumi, Hegelian Dialectic is certainly a consideration in my worldview, but US Citizens, as 'A Navy Vet' says, MUST get off their keisters and do something.

As the author of the article, Mr. Meyer, observes:
"At the core of democracy is the rule of law, and we have already lost it. [emphasis mine] The liberals lecture us incessantly that everything is "relative," but that's not true; some things are absolutes. You cannot claim to be faithful to your spouse because you never cheat on her -- except when you're in London on business. And you cannot claim to have the rule of law if the government can set aside the rule of law when it decides that "special circumstances" have arisen that warrant illegality. When the President and his aides handed ownership of Chrysler Corp. to the United Auto Workers union, they tried to avoid sending that beleaguered company into bankruptcy by muscling its bondholders into accepting less money for their assets than the law entitled them to collect. These contracts, and the law under which they were signed, were mere obstacles to a thuggish President bent on paying off his political supporters."

People with a stake in the specific fight, regardless of "standing", need to make an issue of the lawbreaking and if necessary force the issue.

As long as we sit idly by, waiting for someone else to do something, they will continue to roll over us.

Thanks for the prompt to learn something “new”. (Some things NEVER change).

http://www.amerikanexpose.com/hegel/

Excerpt:

Why is it important for you to understand the subject of the Hegelian Dialectic? Because it is the process by which all change is being accomplished in society today. More importantly, it is the tool that the globalists are utilizing to manipulate the minds of the average American to accept that change, where ordinarily they would refuse it.

The Hegelian Dialectic is, in short, the critical process by which the ruling elite create a problem, anticipating in advance the reaction that the population will have to the given crisis, and thus conditioning the people that a change is needed. When the population is properly conditioned, the desired agenda of the ruling elite is presented as the solution. The solution isn’t intended to solve the problem, but rather to serve as the basis for a new problem or exacerbate the existing one.

When the newly inflamed difficulty reaches the boiling point of a crisis, it becomes the foundation upon which arguments may again be made for change. Hence, the process is repeated, over and over, moving society toward whatever end the planners have in mind.