Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Huntsman strategist: If Palin and Limbaugh dominate, GOP 'headed for a blowout' in 2012
Washington Examiner ^ | 05/18/09 | Byron York

Posted on 05/18/2009 7:22:04 AM PDT by redk

The Republican strategist who helped Utah Gov. Jon Huntsman prepare for a possible presidential run says the Republican party is in for a devastating defeat if its guiding lights are Sarah Palin, Rush Limbaugh and Dick Cheney. "If it's 2012 and our party is defined by Palin and Limbaugh and Cheney, then we're headed for a blowout," says strategist John Weaver, who advised Huntsman and was for years a close adviser to Sen. John McCain. "That's just the truth."

Huntsman, a favorite of GOP moderates, left the Republican presidential race last week after accepting President Obama's offer to become U.S. ambassador to China. Before that, Huntsman appeared to be working hard on preparations for 2012. "He had not made a decision to run for president, but he had made a decision to prepare to run," says Weaver. "We were probably a month away from announcing the formation of a political action committee, so we were pretty far down the road."

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonexaminer.com ...


TOPICS: Extended News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Utah
KEYWORDS: 2012gopprimary; byronyork; huntsman; huntsman4romney; limbaugh; mccain4obama; mccainiac; nomorerinos; palin; purgetherinos; rino; rinoromney; rinotraitor; romney; rush; talkradio; time2partyagain; waronrush; waronsarah
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180 ... 201-215 next last
To: bilhosty
That "very small majority" of Reagan's? Was that his 40-state victory in 1980 or his 49 state majority in 1984? IIRC, Reagan won even Taxachusetts both times.

BTW, how do you define "very small majority?"

141 posted on 05/18/2009 10:35:17 AM PDT by BlackElk (Dean of Discipline of the Tomas de Torquemada Gentlemen's Club)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: ansel12; meandog
It seems that you want to promote the truly despicable Mitt Romney.

Meandog's a McCain man (which is an order of magnitude worse than Romney).

142 posted on 05/18/2009 10:37:41 AM PDT by WhistlingPastTheGraveyard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 139 | View Replies]

To: rodeo-mamma; Leisler; greyfoxx39; Tennessee Nana; EternalVigilance; Reagan Man; Elsie; ...
Weaver = Team Romney

"Ex-McCain aide says he's still loyal
Weaver...provided the critical, on-the-record foundation for stories denigrating (Senator McCain)
After The New York Times published a story Thursday suggesting that John McCain had
an improper relationship with lobbyist Vicki Iseman, his campaign took to the airwaves to trash the story
... Weaver said that when the Times confronted him in December
with details of his meeting with Iseman, he felt compelled to corroborate the story.
Weaver vigorously maintains that he is loyal to McCain. (but note)
... the campaign brought Weaver in just last week to help broker Mitt Romney’s endorsement."


"8. The person who has the clearest chapter-and-verse hold on Mitt Romney's past statements and actions on abortion, gay rights, and other hot button issues is
a. A Boston Globe reporter.
b. John Weaver.
c. Mitt Romney.
d. A DNC oppo researcher.."


"Romney would not say whether he’d been vetted,
but did insist that the vice presidency was a subject he had never even so much discussed with McCain,
with whom he often tangled bitterly in the primary campaign.
So I tried another tack, recalling that I had been in a car with McCain and his then aide John Weaver,
reporting a piece for V.F. in the fall of 2006,
just after McCain delivered an address at Boston College’s opening convocation.
Weaver’s phone rang, and it was someone at B.C.,
informing him that Romney’s office had just called to ask when he would be invited to speak."

143 posted on 05/18/2009 10:38:23 AM PDT by Diogenesis (Igitur qui desiderat pacem, praeparet bellum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 122 | View Replies]

To: rodeo-mamma
Glad you agree that Gov. Palin is the FUTURE of the conservative movement,
and not the poor loser, angry,
carpetbagging, backstabbing, socialist RINO Romney.

Mr. Romney "Disses" Amateur Radio In Televised Town Meeting

"Mitt Romney...alienating America one group at a time." - AlaskaErik


Gov. Sarah Palin, Governor of the state of Alaska, proclaimed the week of July 28 through August 3, 2008 as: Amateur Radio Week

144 posted on 05/18/2009 10:38:58 AM PDT by Diogenesis (Igitur qui desiderat pacem, praeparet bellum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies]

To: ansel12
Compare Romney's utter lack of patriotism to say ........ Gov. Palin.


"Governor Orders POW/MIA Flags Flown for Former Prisoners of War Recognition Day"

"Office of the Governor of the State of Alaska ^ | 04-09-09 | Gov. Sarah Palin
April 9, 2009, Juneau, Alaska – Governor Sarah Palin today signed a proclamation declaring April 9, 2009,
as Former Prisoners of War Recognition Day. The governor has ordered POW/MIA flags
to be flown in honor and memory of American men and women
who have placed themselves in harm’s way and faced the horrors of combat."
“The price paid by POW/MIA soldiers in defense of liberty is worthy of our highest
gratitude and most solemn remembrance,” Governor Palin said.
“On this day and always, they are in our thoughts and prayers. We will never forget them or their service.”

versus


"National Guard Lt. Anthony Circosta poses in his backyard in Agawam, Mass., on June 9, 2007.
At left, his wife Danielle and daughter Kylie, 2, talk near the swing set. Circosta,
a decorated Iraq War veteran, seemed like an ideal candidate for a pardon from
then-Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney for the 29-year-old's boyhood conviction
for a BB gun shooting. Romney denied the pardon,
twice, despite the recommendation of the Governor's Council.
"



145 posted on 05/18/2009 10:40:50 AM PDT by Diogenesis (Igitur qui desiderat pacem, praeparet bellum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 137 | View Replies]

To: ansel12
It is your perception and your smear that you are trying to sell about Governor Palin. It seems that you want to promote the truly despicable Mitt Romney

My ideal candidate would be Gen. David Petraeus. I only said I suspect that Romney would be the standard bearer in 2012. I base that upon the credible primary race he ran his first time around. BTW, I wasn't a supporter of Romney in 2008 though I do not find him "truly despicable" as you apparently do.

146 posted on 05/18/2009 10:45:40 AM PDT by meandog (If you don't like pitbulls, don't get one!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 139 | View Replies]

To: redk

Then obviously Huntsan is copying McCain and listening to Powell.

Do these idiots even TALK to anyone who is not an old, out of shape shriveled old GOP political wanabe?

Has anyone been to a GOP LOCAL meeting lately?

It is mostly retired old timers who are CLUELESS about social networking. They think just because they have email they actually are internet savy. It is excruciatinly frustrating because such idiots are needed by the Steeles and McCains in order to maintain the RINO stranglehold on the party escaping from the jimmy carter republicans.

We need to desperatly control the locals in order to control the national party.


147 posted on 05/18/2009 10:49:42 AM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bilhosty
Reagan won a very small majority

Now that is funny, you may want to look into that a little deeper. Try googling biggest landslide in American history and you will see Reagan mentioned (1984 election).

In 1980 Reagan only carried 44 states, winning 489 electoral votes and beating Carter by a 10 point margin in the popular vote.

148 posted on 05/18/2009 10:53:48 AM PDT by ansel12 (Romney (guns)"instruments of destruction with the sole purpose of hunting down and killing people")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: meandog
Are you denying the fact that Cheney got 5 student deferments during Vietnam; that Rush Limbaugh has been divorced three times and abused prescription pain medication, or that Bristol Palin was unwed and pregnant?

I'll deny that anything you're parroting from the nutroots' talking points are even a little bit relevant. After the current president and his plagiarizing horse's ass of a running mate (who also had five deferments) beat the Great War Hero, none of it matters anymore.

And last I checked, Rush wasn't running for anything, so his divorces are a moot point. Besides, it wasn't like he cheated on one of them with a beer heiress beauty queen after she was in a horrible car accident.

149 posted on 05/18/2009 10:53:58 AM PDT by WhistlingPastTheGraveyard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 134 | View Replies]

To: libh8er

It is the “hired gun” advisors who are embeded in the DC beltway country club.

no principles of right or wrong just elected win or lose.


150 posted on 05/18/2009 10:58:29 AM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: meandog
I wasn't a supporter of Romney in 2008 though I do not find him "truly despicable" as you apparently do.

A man that reveals such a compulsion to lie is despicable, claiming that he marched with MLK, owns guns, lifetime hunter, that Reagan was "adamantly" pro-choice, "I longed to serve in Vietnam", and you know that the list continues, this kind of lying goes far beyond political spin, these are the lies of a man that can't control himself, it destroys any claim to morality that the man can make.

151 posted on 05/18/2009 10:59:42 AM PDT by ansel12 (Romney (guns)"instruments of destruction with the sole purpose of hunting down and killing people")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 146 | View Replies]

To: WhistlingPastTheGraveyard
I'll deny that anything you're parroting from the nutroots' talking points are even a little bit relevant. After the current president and his plagiarizing horse's ass of a running mate (who also had five deferments) beat the Great War Hero, none of it matters anymore.

I don't believe the post was directed to you WPTGY...nonetheless, you'll get no argument from me about Biden's apparent draft-dodging cowardice. But this isn't about him, is it? It was about Cheney and Rush (who incidentally got deferred for a cyst on his butt) and Palin as the "pure" examples of unsullied conservative Republicans that hold the keys to lead the GOP to victory in 2012. I believe the keys lie more in line with someone espousing a limited government and a strong defense but, as well, someone who has walked the mile or two in a pair of combat boots and worn a uniform to back it up...apparently you feel differently.

152 posted on 05/18/2009 11:10:07 AM PDT by meandog (If you don't like pitbulls, don't get one!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 149 | View Replies]

To: ansel12
A man that reveals such a compulsion to lie is despicable, claiming that he marched with MLK, owns guns, lifetime hunter, that Reagan was "adamantly" pro-choice, "I longed to serve in Vietnam", and you know that the list continues, this kind of lying goes far beyond political spin, these are the lies of a man that can't control himself, it destroys any claim to morality that the man can make.

Well, I said he wasn't my choice in 2008 (mainly because of his religious deferment during Vietnam) but, in his defense, I believe it was his father whom he claimed marched with MLK. But I still don't find him "truly despicable" ... "truly Machiavellian" perhaps.

153 posted on 05/18/2009 11:20:24 AM PDT by meandog (If you don't like pitbulls, don't get one!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 151 | View Replies]

To: meandog
I believe it was his father whom he claimed marched with MLK. But I still don't find him "truly despicable" ... "truly Machiavellian" perhaps.

A public compulsive liar is despicable, Romney has made both claims at different times about just his dad marching and also Mitt and his dad marching. Remember this lying stuff goes back several decades.

154 posted on 05/18/2009 11:27:30 AM PDT by ansel12 (Romney (guns)"instruments of destruction with the sole purpose of hunting down and killing people")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 153 | View Replies]

To: meandog

I don’t care if was directed at me or not. Nobody gives a damn about draft deferments that happened 40 years ago. Lose the silly DK talking point.


155 posted on 05/18/2009 11:36:40 AM PDT by WhistlingPastTheGraveyard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 152 | View Replies]

To: ansel12
This is despicable

WASHINGTON – House Speaker Nancy Pelosi bluntly accused the CIA on Thursday of misleading her and other lawmakers about its use of waterboarding during the Bush administration, escalating a controversy grown to include both political parties, the spy agency and the White House. "It is not the policy of this agency to mislead the United States Congress," responded CIA spokesman George Little, although he refused to answer directly when asked whether Pelosi's accusation was accurate.

This is Not

Ft DODGE, IA -- A defensive Romney was peppered with questions today on exactly what he meant when he said -- most recently on Meet the Press -- that he "saw" his father march with Martin Luther King Jr. Recent articles have indicated that his father, the late Michigan Gov. George Romney, didn't march with the civil-rights leader. Admitting that he didn't see the march with his own eyes, he said, "I 'saw' him in the figurative sense." "The reference of seeing my father lead in civil rights," he said, "and seeing my father march with Martin Luther King is in the sense of this figurative awareness of and recognition of his leadership." "I've tried to be as accurate as I can be," he continued, smiling firmly. "If you look at the literature or look at the dictionary, the term 'saw' includes being aware of -- in the sense I've described." The questioning did not relent. "I'm an English literature major," he insisted at one point. "When we say I saw the Patriots win the World Series, it doesn't necessarily mean you were there." (He meant the Super Bowl, of course.)

156 posted on 05/18/2009 11:46:51 AM PDT by meandog (If you don't like pitbulls, don't get one!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 154 | View Replies]

To: WhistlingPastTheGraveyard
II don’t care if was directed at me or not. Nobody gives a damn about draft deferments that happened 40 years ago. Lose the silly DK talking point.

I care...because I was there! Find some reason to be thankful for the men and women who provide service to your country.

157 posted on 05/18/2009 11:54:55 AM PDT by meandog (If you don't like pitbulls, don't get one!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 155 | View Replies]

To: carmody

So you would rather have an outright leftist like Obama for a second term?


158 posted on 05/18/2009 12:06:35 PM PDT by j.simmons (If you are not with the GOP, you are with the Democrats.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 140 | View Replies]

To: ansel12
Yes bu tin 1980 you are forgetting Anderson took votes away mostly from the Dem's.Reagan won by about 51%. That year it was a small majority.
Reagan won the moderates that year because the Dem's lost them. Don't think you have a Reagan and that chance Every time because you won't.
159 posted on 05/18/2009 12:08:13 PM PDT by bilhosty (Tax payers for change)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 148 | View Replies]

To: bilhosty

If anything Anderson took votes from moderate republicans, by 1984 Reagan went from overwhelming victory in 1980 to historical landslide in 1984.

1980 Presidential campaign
“In the 1980 presidential election, Anderson entered the Republican primary for the U.S. Presidential election, in a crowded field that included Ronald Reagan and George H. W. Bush, and therefore did not run for reelection to the House. He received little media notice until a Republican debate. Candidates were asked if there were any actions in their past that they had come to regret. Most of them dodged the question, but Anderson took it head-on, telling viewers that, if he could, he would reverse his vote for the Gulf of Tonkin Resolution. His popularity increased dramatically overnight.

His best showing was on March 4, finishing a strong second to George Bush in the Massachusetts primary and Ronald Reagan in the Vermont primary, losing both contests by less than a thousand votes. That spring, following the Wisconsin primary, at which time it was apparent that Reagan would win the nomination, he dropped out of the primary race to run as an independent candidate for the fall general election.”


160 posted on 05/18/2009 12:23:29 PM PDT by ansel12 (Romney (guns)"instruments of destruction with the sole purpose of hunting down and killing people")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 159 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180 ... 201-215 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson