Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Euro zone contracted by massive 2.5 pct in Q1
AP ^ | 05/15/09 | Pan Pylas

Posted on 05/15/2009 8:33:01 AM PDT by TigerLikesRooster

Euro zone contracted by massive 2.5 pct in Q1

Euro zone economy contracted by massive 2.5 percent in Q1, fourth straight decline

Pan Pylas, AP Business Writer

On Friday May 15, 2009, 7:24 am EDT

Buzz up! Print LONDON (AP) -- The economy in the 16 countries that use the euro shrank by a massive 2.5 percent in the first quarter as a global recession sapped the industrial exports that Europe relies on for growth and jobs.

Germany, the euro zone's biggest economy, saw output plunge by 3.8 percent as demand for its cars and factory machinery collapsed -- its biggest economic contraction since at least 1970, when West Germany started to compile records.

The euro zone has now seen output decline for four consecutive quarters. The first quarter slump is the biggest since figures began in 1995, but most analysts think the region is in its worst slump since the end of World War II.

(Excerpt) Read more at finance.yahoo.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Extended News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 1stquarter; contraction; euro
Don't worry. Second derivative is said to be up.:-)
1 posted on 05/15/2009 8:33:02 AM PDT by TigerLikesRooster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster; PAR35; AndyJackson; Thane_Banquo; nicksaunt; MadLibDisease; happygrl; ...

Ping!


2 posted on 05/15/2009 8:34:01 AM PDT by TigerLikesRooster (LUV DIC -- L,U,V-shaped recession, Depression, Inflation, Collapse)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

2.5 or annual rate of 2.5?


3 posted on 05/15/2009 8:39:03 AM PDT by jimfree (Freep and ye shall find!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jimfree

I interpret the article as “2.5% for the quarter”, 10.0% annually (ignoring compounding).


4 posted on 05/15/2009 8:40:58 AM PDT by DuncanWaring (The Lord uses the good ones; the bad ones use the Lord.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: DuncanWaring

That is reasonable, however economic growth quarterly reports often speak to an annual rate. The writer of this piece is not a regular economics report.


5 posted on 05/15/2009 8:45:13 AM PDT by jimfree (Freep and ye shall find!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: jimfree
2.5 or annual rate of 2.5?

Another article stated that it was a 4.6% drop from one year ago, so I suspect that it is 2.5% just for the first quarter or else they would be talking of the recession bottoming out. Yike!

6 posted on 05/15/2009 8:50:54 AM PDT by KarlInOhio (No free man bows to a foreign king.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: jimfree

I’m pretty sure they do it q-on-q, so it would be 10% annual, which makes sense it you consider Germany is contracting over 8% and much of E. Europe by 10-15%.


7 posted on 05/15/2009 8:56:46 AM PDT by Rob the Ugly Dude
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: jimfree

The subheading uses the term “massive”. A 2.5% annual dip in GDP is not “massive. 10% is, so he must be talking 2.5% for the quarter. Yes, that is massive and equates to “depression” level GDP contraction.


8 posted on 05/16/2009 4:10:36 PM PDT by Freedom_Is_Not_Free (Depression Countdown: 55... 54... 53...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson