Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: porter_knorr

Stop replacing the husband with government.

Remove the alleviation of consequences for choosing to have children without a husband.

Not to rebuke too firmly, but a conservative should know this as a matter of basic ideology.

Now, implementing the removal of welfare, housing subsidies, etc... that’ll be a political challenge, to be sure.


106 posted on 05/14/2009 5:21:47 AM PDT by MrB (Go Galt now, Bowman later)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies ]


To: MrB

Sure I get the conservative ideology behind your post.

But the real world is not always in step with conservative ideology. In real life what do you suggest if a woman is pregnant and single? Do you want the government to step in and take the child? There’s always going to be women who get pregnant outside of marriage. So right now today, what do you think should be the real life fix to your statement.

(I’m not talking about baby factories who do it for welfare purposes, I’m talking about your general statement of “if a woman makes choices leading to having a baby without a husband, she is intentionally raising a criminal.”)


111 posted on 05/14/2009 7:41:55 AM PDT by porter_knorr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson