To: skeeter
Gad, if Michael Landon were still alive, I would have guessed he’d be in his sixties by now. But to have a son that age... wow, Landon was older than I thought.
3 posted on
05/12/2009 5:06:06 PM PDT by
RightOnTheLeftCoast
(1st call: Abbas. 1st interview: Al Arabiya. 1st energy decision: halt drilling in UT. Arabs 1st!)
To: RightOnTheLeftCoast
Michael Landon was born 31 October, 1936 — that would make him 73.
http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0001446/
The child was adopted, so I guess Michael was a young adult and the kid in his teens?
9 posted on
05/12/2009 5:10:50 PM PDT by
freedumb2003
(Communism comes to America: 1/20/2009. Keep your powder dry, folks. Sic semper tyrannis)
To: RightOnTheLeftCoast
Yeah, that’s more shocking than Michael Jackson turning 50.
14 posted on
05/12/2009 5:12:37 PM PDT by
rvoitier
(One of the 25 million)
To: RightOnTheLeftCoast
I had the exact same reaction. Guess Michael Landon will never be older than 30 in my mind.
33 posted on
05/12/2009 5:36:00 PM PDT by
EDINVA
(A government that robs Peter to pay Paul can always depend on the support of Paul -- G. B. Shaw)
To: RightOnTheLeftCoast
If Landon was 54 in 1991, as stated, he would have been 72 in 2009. That makes him 12 when his son was born.
57 posted on
05/12/2009 6:54:51 PM PDT by
luvbach1
(Worse than we could have imagined.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson