Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

CHINA, INDIA 'MAY STIR UP REGIONAL WAR': ARMY REPORT
defense india ^ | 5/10/09 | defense india

Posted on 05/10/2009 12:00:59 PM PDT by Flavius

The report, obtained by The Weekend Australian, also makes more hawkish comments about India's military ambitions than Defence has admitted.

A draft copy of an army report, Army's Future Land Operating Concept, due to be finalised in September, warns about China and India's military ambitions.

"China and India's growing military ambitions, matched by growing military spending, have the potential to destabilise the region with their military expansion," the report states.

The defence white paper released last Saturday warned only that China's military modernisation might "give its neighbours cause for concern if not carefully explained".

The different wording in the documents suggests the white paper was toned down for public release to avoid causing offence in Beijing and New Delhi.

The army document is more pessimistic than the white paper about future regional stability, warning of a "real potential" for war between major powers.

"China, and potentially India ... have the potential to challenge US (strategic) dominance within their regions," the report states. "Of particular concern is an increased likelihood for dispute escalation as a result of changes to the perceived balance of power with the real potential for a return to major combat operations involving states."


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: war
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-38 next last
how exactly do you have a war with nukes
1 posted on 05/10/2009 12:00:59 PM PDT by Flavius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Flavius
It sounds like Tom Clacey’s worst nightmare.
2 posted on 05/10/2009 12:03:45 PM PDT by Perdogg (0bama - America's Elegabalus and Commodus combined)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Flavius
Same old Sh** different year...


3 posted on 05/10/2009 12:05:51 PM PDT by darkwing104 (Lets get dangerous)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki; swarthyguy; Cronos

Ping!


4 posted on 05/10/2009 12:07:06 PM PDT by MyTwoCopperCoins (I don't have a license to kill; I have a learner's permit.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Flavius

China v.India? That’s lots of cannon fodder.


5 posted on 05/10/2009 12:08:18 PM PDT by Poison Pill (The Bond Market: Doing the job the Republicans won't do.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Flavius

Obviously still another place for SuperSam to send troops.


6 posted on 05/10/2009 12:10:24 PM PDT by ex-snook ("Above all things, truth beareth away the victory.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Flavius

Of course *China* has military ambitions.But India? India is surrounded on at least two sides by nuclear armed heathen states.India is a democratic country located in a neighborhood of punk nations.She has the right to defend herself.She has *good* reason to be frightened....*very* frightened...of at least a couple of her neighbors.


7 posted on 05/10/2009 12:12:43 PM PDT by Gay State Conservative (Christian+Veteran=Terrorist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Flavius
"how exactly do you have a war with nukes"

There are numerous possibilities.

It is now believed that the Nazi's (WWII Germany - not the ones running the US government) used nukes against the Russian Army on the Eastern Front. Small nukes fired by artillery, that produced much more damage than conventional explosives.

I would expect that smaller nukes would be first used against military targets, in the same way as conventional weapons, but with greater killing power. Then, industrial targets would be taken out with appropriate sized nukes. Then, you just keep going, until somebody is defeated.

Also, keep in mind, just because Jimmy Carter (Barack Obama the First) stopped the US from building the Neutron Bomb, doesn't mean that other nations don't have it. We also talk about the consequences of a large EMF device on our nation's power grid and electronics. It's quite possible that other nations have that capability.

There are many ways to use nukes. It isn't just about a gazillion gigatons on a major city. Remember, the Nazi's had the ability to do that to the US, and actually conceived a plan to nuke Manhattan, but chose not to. You just have to be clever and creative, like our enemies, and think of nukes as just another weapon.

Like our enemies.

8 posted on 05/10/2009 12:19:02 PM PDT by ChicagahAl (Don't blame me. I voted for Sarah.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg

Sounds like part of last week’s episode of “Prison Break.”


9 posted on 05/10/2009 12:20:43 PM PDT by buccaneer81 (Bob Taft has soiled the family name for the next century.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Poison Pill
"China v.India? That’s lots of cannon fodder"

The article actually mentions India vs the US.

"China, and potentially India ... have the potential to challenge US (strategic) dominance within their regions,"

10 posted on 05/10/2009 12:20:55 PM PDT by ChicagahAl (Don't blame me. I voted for Sarah.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: ChicagahAl

Your stating the Nazi regime had nukes and didn’t use them? Can you provide some sources for this?


11 posted on 05/10/2009 12:24:18 PM PDT by JFaron (What price the loss of our sovereignty?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: JFaron; ChicagahAl

no, he is stating the Nazi’s had nukes and did use them. I would like to read that as well.


12 posted on 05/10/2009 12:35:11 PM PDT by Steve Van Doorn (*in my best Eric cartman voice* 'I love you guys')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: ChicagahAl
The article actually mentions India vs the US.

Not as long as we're keeping the Pakis in check.

13 posted on 05/10/2009 12:39:56 PM PDT by Poison Pill (The Bond Market: Doing the job the Republicans won't do.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: JFaron

The Nazis were years from developing a nuke.

We got there first. We won. Game over.


14 posted on 05/10/2009 12:42:32 PM PDT by warchild9 (Starve the Beast: don't buy it if you don't need it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: ChicagahAl

Nazi nukes? Are you kidding? Who/when/where/why/what on that source, please.


15 posted on 05/10/2009 12:50:01 PM PDT by CHATTAB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

Comment #16 Removed by Moderator

To: Gay State Conservative

The way India would wage war against the US is to not pick up the fone when America calls for help with Windows!


17 posted on 05/10/2009 12:52:42 PM PDT by swarthyguy ("We may be crazy in Pakistan, but not completely out of our minds," ISI Gen. Ahmed Shujaa Pasha)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: SonOfPyrodex
Once, and loudly.

Bright lights! Bright lights!

18 posted on 05/10/2009 12:53:18 PM PDT by Allegra ( Never argue with an idiot. They bring you down to their level and beat you with experience.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: JFaron
"Can you provide some sources for this?"

Farrell's research is the one I'm most familiar with. He claims that the US government buried the information after WWII so the public would not find out how close the Nazi's came to nuking us.

"Black Sun Reich"

"Dr Joseph Farrell"

"Nazi Secret Weapons"

"Inventory of Nazi Secret Weapons"

"Sonicbomb"

"Nazi Nuke Sketch"

19 posted on 05/10/2009 12:57:18 PM PDT by ChicagahAl (Don't blame me. I voted for Sarah.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: JFaron; ChicagahAl
I remember hearing rumors that a nuclear bomb may have been exploded during the Sino-Soviet border conflict...possible but very likely.
20 posted on 05/10/2009 1:04:56 PM PDT by Red Dog #1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-38 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson