Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: MinuteGal

The original White House photo, as released, was run through Photoshop for some reason. See my post above.


43 posted on 05/09/2009 8:30:23 PM PDT by Royal Wulff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]


To: Royal Wulff
This deserves a thread of its own to explicitly discuss evidence that this was a photoshopped picture.
45 posted on 05/10/2009 6:16:30 AM PDT by Clive
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies ]

To: Royal Wulff; PowderMonkey
It doesn't really matter if it was run through photoshop. The EXIF data however was purposefully removed. As you can see, the other AF1 stock photos have EXIF data albeit limited. What it says though is that the photo was either run through a filter or just the EXIF data removed. It doesn't look like it was run through a filter or enhanced which is actually odd because it is a lousy shot. Now the photo up at the defense link somebody did enhance that copy.
About the exhaust it's hard to tell because they are over water but I do not see any noticeable distortion or blurring of the water surface wave pattern.

The big problem with this image is that it is terrible!! You don't take AF1 glamour shots through a window! This is an amateur photo!!
The flight was so obviously not for the stated purpose and they think we are all idiots!
46 posted on 05/10/2009 3:55:10 PM PDT by visualops (portraits.artlife.us or visit my freeper page)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson