Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Networks Likely To Turn Down Obama Primetime Request
imdb.com ^ | May 8, 2009

Posted on 05/09/2009 1:33:20 AM PDT by paudio

After losing some $30 million from advertisers while they covered President Obama's three primetime news conferences in recent months, the major television networks are likely to follow Fox's lead and turn down the White House when it asks them to preempt a primetime time period any time soon, the Hollywood Reporter reported today (Friday), citing several unnamed network executives. "We will continue to make our decisions on White House requests on a case-by-case basis, but the Fox decision gives us cover to reject a request if we feel that there is no urgent breaking news that is going to be discussed," one network exec told the trade publication.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Extended News; Government
KEYWORDS: bho44; foxtv; msm; networks; obama; second100days; television; tpd; tv
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-30 last
To: ladyvet

Perhaps he should fund his own cable channel. He could call it a “jobs program.”


21 posted on 05/09/2009 7:05:07 AM PDT by ShandaLear (I LOVE RUSH!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: paudio
How long before this Democrat Congress and Democrat Administration get the bright idea to start appropriating public money to buy the same air time for these important and necessary "public" national leadership events on network TV?

After all, this is chump change to them and it's all a part of "serving the people" and keeping them properly informed, is it not?

22 posted on 05/09/2009 7:14:33 AM PDT by Gritty (The world has concluded Obama is nourished by applause for his perpetual candidacy-VD Hanson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RU88
Absolutely. Hence my tag-line. Sometimes doing nothing at all is the best course of action.

For government, it is just about always true.

Katrina is the best example. An instilled welfare attitude trapped those people into not even trying to help themselves.

Just read a fascinating article on survival - survivors take personal responsibility. Duh.

23 posted on 05/09/2009 7:47:22 AM PDT by 1010RD (First Do No Harm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: paudio
Dear networks. So you think you are tough enough to turn your master away? What part of THIS don't you pansies understand:

"Who the f*** do you think you're dealing with? We'll have the IRS audit your fund. Every one of your employees. Your investors. Then we will have the Securities and Exchange Commission rip through your books looking for anything and everything and nothing we find to destroy you with."

24 posted on 05/09/2009 8:29:10 AM PDT by Enterprise (The Porkulus brought us economic swine flu.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: paudio
"We will continue to make our decisions on White House requests on a case-by-case basis, but the Fox decision gives us cover to reject a request if we feel that there is no urgent breaking news that is going to be discussed," one network exec told the trade publication."

You people at the networks don't quite understand do you? First, it is never a request from Obama, it is a demand. Second, it doesn't matter if YOU lose money, it only matters that the messiah gets on prime time at a time of his convenience. So as the great Pamela Lee said - "Suck it."

25 posted on 05/09/2009 8:32:57 AM PDT by Enterprise (The Porkulus brought us economic swine flu.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 1010RD
The media will have to adjust to the new world soon.

In the past, as long as Republicans were a factor in politics, the media and their opinions, and their profits, mattered. Democrats welcomed them with open arms and made them believe that their input was highly valued. For now though, they don't really matter. Obama and the Rats have total control over everything except the Supreme Court, and that will change soon enough. The media is of no further use to the Democrats. Too bad, how sad.

(I hate to do this, but here goes. Hey media, if you want to be considered a "playah" once more, get more Republicans elected so that political balance is restored. Then, the Democrats will respect you in the morning again.)

26 posted on 05/09/2009 8:39:26 AM PDT by Enterprise (The Porkulus brought us economic swine flu.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: listenhillary
"Think that he will let a few media bigwigs stand in his way?"

IMO - no. But for the sake of speculation, I wonder how Obama would handle it if the news print media and the broadcast media got so ticked off that 24/7, they began running full scale investigations into the administration scandals, and began demanding special prosecutors?

27 posted on 05/09/2009 8:45:14 AM PDT by Enterprise (The Porkulus brought us economic swine flu.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Enterprise
Yes, their tsunami is a combination of rampant liberalism (caused by self-selection) and rapid technological change, that they perceived as a mouse v. dinosaur situation (too late to notice the mice eating their eggs).

I think the new media will be interesting in that I've never been to DU. Will this create a new institutional bias?

During the Nixon years the favorite conspirator's phrase was, “do you have the correct information?”

Isn't that the direction we are headed with liberals having their “facts” and we ours?

28 posted on 05/09/2009 8:52:11 AM PDT by 1010RD (First Do No Harm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: 1010RD
During the Nixon years the favorite conspirator's phrase was, “do you have the correct information?”

Isn't that the direction we are headed with liberals having their “facts” and we ours?"

I think we are back in the Clinton era. Truth and facts don't matter unless the media investigates something and agrees with it.

29 posted on 05/09/2009 9:09:27 AM PDT by Enterprise (The Porkulus brought us economic swine flu.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: paudio

Pretty brave of them. I’ve heard this administration has specialist in kneecaps and legs willing to apply their expertise.


30 posted on 05/09/2009 3:50:23 PM PDT by Joan Kerrey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-30 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson