Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Of shoddy combat helmets and Democratic corruption
American Thinker ^ | May 08, 2009 | Ed Lasky

Posted on 05/08/2009 10:24:03 PM PDT by neverdem

This story may or may not become big news. But it certainly says a lot about the earmark culture on Capitol Hill.

A contractor, beneficiary of an earmark that the lobbyist group with close ties to John Murtha got for them, produced combat helmets so shoddy that the military has recalled 34,000 of them.

The lobbyists, PMA Group, is mostly identified with Murtha but also garnered an astonishing number of earmarks from other lawmakers from both parties. They are now under investigation by the FBI for illegal campaign contributions among other transgressions.

PMA Group Watch has the details:

The Army has issued a recall of more than 34,000 advanced-combat helmets that failed ballistics tests, a move certain to attract scrutiny on Capitol Hill.

But an added element of intrigue that may also catch lawmakers' attention is the firm that lobbied on behalf of the helmet's manufacturer: the PMA Group.

Gentex Corp. in Carbondale, Pa., manufactures those helmets and is based in Rep. Chris Carney's (D) district. Gentex has received earmarks sponsored by the lawmaker in recent years. In the 2008 defense appropriations bill, for example, Carney and Sen. Bob Casey Jr. (D-Pa.) earmarked $2.7 million for improved performance for helmet displays and life support technologies . . .

The PMA Group and its lobbyists were the top contributors to Carney's reelection campaign, pitching in $41,500, according to data provided by the Center for Responsive Politics. The same data indicate that Gentex was Carney's fifth campaign contributor.

Way to go, Carney and Casey. Thank goodness they were around to steer that earmark; otherwise that $2.7 million could have gone to some other firm that makes helmets that are actually up to standards.





TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: chriscarney; gentexcorp; helmets; pmagroup
Culture of corruption!
1 posted on 05/08/2009 10:24:04 PM PDT by neverdem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: neverdem

May 5, Military.com – (National) Army recalls some combat helmets. The Army has issued a recall of more than 30,000 helmets — not because the helmet shells are flawed, but because it found that four screws that attach the chinstrap and related parts did not meet Army specs. The screws were supplied by a subcontractor to helmet-maker Gentex Corp., according to the Army. In a press release issued May 4, the Army said Gentex is alleging the subcontractor falsified certificates of compliance for the steel screws it furnished for the helmets. In all, 34,218 Advanced Combat Helmets are being recalled for failing ballistic tests. The number includes 15,380 Army helmets, 12,000 Air Force helmets and another 6,838 helmets which were never issued by Defense Logistics Agency. Gentex is one of four companies that makes the helmets, and has delivered 297,000 of the 1.2 million that the Army has received, officials said. Source: http://www.military.com/news/article/army-recalls-some-combat-helmets.html


2 posted on 05/08/2009 10:43:34 PM PDT by smokingfrog ( Don't mess with the mockingbird! /\/\ http://tiny.cc/freepthis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wardaddy; Joe Brower; Cannoneer No. 4; Criminal Number 18F; Dan from Michigan; Eaker; Jeff Head; ...
Victor Davis Hanson: Why Did Republicans Lose Their Appeal? And how can they get it back?

Obama sounds death knell for nuclear power

Ancient Greece's 'global warming'

Climate change and the fierce urgency of now

Some noteworthy articles about politics, foreign or military affairs, IMHO, FReepmail me if you want on or off my list.

3 posted on 05/08/2009 10:56:35 PM PDT by neverdem (Xin loi minh oi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

After all the sport the Left had with the Humvee and body armor issues, it would be a shame to have them miss out on all the fun of corrupt war-profiteering accusations that they richly seem to deserve.


4 posted on 05/08/2009 10:58:19 PM PDT by ccmay (Too much Law; not enough Order.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: smokingfrog

Thanks for the text & link.


5 posted on 05/08/2009 10:58:47 PM PDT by neverdem (Xin loi minh oi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

I got out of defense contracting. My company had a perfect record for quality and on time delivery. Time and again we got beat out by larger companies with higher priced bids for the same Item. After a while it became clear that the only way to really make decent money doing what I was doing was to “buy the project under the table”. Since I did not feel inclined to be a part of the problem or go broke being honest, I quit defense contracting all together. The buyers sometimes told us that they didn’t want to do business with a small company even on a small business set aside project. The system is so corrupt I decided I should not be a part of it. Strange to say, but I learned early on that you don’t get far working for crooks. And The government contracting was as crooked as the worst of the industry buying departments I ever contracted with. So morally I felt like it would be wrong for me to squander my life working for the crooks who appropriate our tax dollars through bribery, patronage, kickbacks, and graft.


6 posted on 05/09/2009 1:48:10 AM PDT by ME-262 (We need Term Limits for the federal house and senate. We need new Bums up there.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: smokingfrog
My sister works for Gentex. The company has been around as long as I can remember; it probably dates back to WW2.

Generally they make good products. They have a tougher time competing these days because some of the work they used to do is now done in prisons at a fraction of the cost. That's good for taxpayers, bad for people losing jobs to prisoners.

And now this. Gentex is a major local employer and about 200 people are out of work. My sister is still holding on.

I hope everything gets straightened out. It seems once the politicians get involved innocent people suffer.

7 posted on 05/09/2009 2:46:24 AM PDT by NEPA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ccmay

Sadly, it won’t see the light of day.

We’ll need to send it out by email.


8 posted on 05/09/2009 3:56:52 AM PDT by 1010RD (First Do No Harm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

The Democrat party is a Criminal Enterprise


9 posted on 05/09/2009 4:26:34 AM PDT by bert (K.E. N.P. +12 . Crucify ! Crucify ! Crucify him!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ME-262

You needed to have me for a COR (Contracting Officer’s Representative)! I manage two contracts for separate Army contracting offices. One is a little on the flaky side, but the other more than makes up for it. As a case in point, we are currently negotiating for an option to have some work performed for the next three months. It would be easier for both the government and the contractor to use either a T&M (time and materials) or cost plus contract, both of which are allowed by law. We are using a FFP (Firm Fixed Price) instead.

In a FFP contract the risk is fully on the contractor for them to perform. It may cost a little more at the beginning, but there is no provision for the cost overruns seen so often with a cost plus or T&M. They bid, we evaluate it, if it meets the statement of work and is within the budget, they get the award. Then they have to produce.

Does the contractor have a lobbyist telling them how much is in the appropriation? I don’t know, that is between congress and the lobbyist. If there is any corruption that is where it is.


10 posted on 05/09/2009 4:53:07 AM PDT by SLB (Wyoming's Alan Simpson on the Washington press - "all you get is controversy, crap and confusion")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: SLB

I was once involved in procurement for a very prestigous building. The State Department invited us to come for a face to face presentation.

As we were leaving, down the hall, we saw our competitor AND TIP O’Neal!! They were also leaving

We got the contract.


11 posted on 05/09/2009 5:01:24 AM PDT by bert (K.E. N.P. +12 . Crucify ! Crucify ! Crucify him!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: ccmay

Every time I see a thread like this I go over to DU to see what their take on it is, highly anticipating their comeuppance. What I inevitably see is that the news either doesn’t exist, is there with three minimal replies, or most likely, one of their members has “found” a section of the memo that was released that exonerates the ‘Rats involved. Bottom line is, they’ll never, ever, EVER accept responsibility for anything that their corrupt reps get involved in. EVER. And the MSM sure as hell isn’t going to hold them accountable.


12 posted on 05/09/2009 5:33:54 AM PDT by Hardastarboard (I long for the days when advertisers didn't constantly ask about the health of my genital organs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

The next phase of “war protests”... selling the army defective equipment.

{Aid, comfort, enemies... is this treason?}


13 posted on 05/09/2009 7:28:51 AM PDT by OneWingedShark (Q: Why am I here? A: To do Justly, to love mercy, and to walk humbly with my God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

Thanks for the ping!


14 posted on 05/09/2009 8:43:16 AM PDT by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson