To: reaganaut1
"Not only was there no objection, there was actually concern about whether the agency was doing enough." Sounds like Pelosi is going to be one of the defendents if her comrades decide to carry out their "war crimes" fiasco for their Muslim terrorist buddies.
2 posted on
05/08/2009 8:48:31 PM PDT by
FlingWingFlyer
(Politicians always love to talk about "hard work." What the hell would they know about it?)
To: reaganaut1
These days, Speaker Pelosi insists she heard and saw no evil.I feel a song coming on.
3 posted on
05/08/2009 8:50:36 PM PDT by
dr_lew
To: reaganaut1
4 posted on
05/08/2009 8:51:43 PM PDT by
SandRat
(Duty, Honor, Country! What else needs said?)
To: reaganaut1
Mr. Rockefeller disclaimed any knowledge of the opinions. "If White House documents exist that set the policy for the use of coercive techniques such as waterboarding, those documents have been kept from the committee," said Mr. Rockefeller. Amusingly, or almost, Senator Rockefeller's denial is flatly contradicted by his own report on the subject released last month, which notes that "On May 19, 2008, the Department of Justice and the Central Intelligence Agency provided the Committee with access to all opinions and a number of other documents prepared by the Office of Legal Counsel . . . concerning the legality of the CIA's detention and interrogation program. Five of these documents provided addressed the use of waterboarding."
"Flatly contradicted" = LIAR!
6 posted on
05/08/2009 9:01:49 PM PDT by
jiggyboy
(Ten per cent of poll respondents are either lying or insane)
To: reaganaut1
What did Pelosi know and when did she know it?
And when did she forget she knew it?
Stupidity, not senility...
7 posted on
05/08/2009 9:08:31 PM PDT by
bigbob
To: reaganaut1
If Pelosi is a liar, this leftist you must fire!
To: reaganaut1
9 posted on
05/08/2009 9:34:21 PM PDT by
mirkwood
(Dec. 21, 2012)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson