Posted on 05/08/2009 3:55:43 PM PDT by euram
As Palin pointed out to Salazar, the USGS assessment "estimates that Arctic Alaska has mean technically recoverable resources of approximately 30 billion barrels of oil, 6 billion barrels of natural gas liquids and 221 trillion cubic feet of conventional natural gas."
(Excerpt) Read more at ibdeditorials.com ...
I will go you one better. I do not believe that the first American voted for the communistic sob.
Exactly. And I much prefer my version of the Faor Tax. Its called a Poll Tax. Reinstitute. Only way to secure the freedom guaranteed by the Constitution.
You do realize how stupid you are. Wait until the man comes home and tells you the toilets need cleaning.
Eagle, you’re just baiting
“Women (generally) are more willing than men to trade freedom away for security. And that’s how we got to where we are.”
Not exactly true.
You have left out a large part of that equation and that is the men who refuse to be responsible for their families.
The problem is the direct result of morality.
Plenty of men out there who want the roll in the sack with a bunch of women and not take the responsibility for any offspring they may produce . That leaves a woman with choice of raising that family alone or having an abortion.
Women are programed to give some stuff up in order to take care of their offspring (if men had to raise the babies for the most part they would left out the door for the wolves) So these women are looking for someone to take care of them and since there is no man around they look to the government. (yeah it’s wrong but it is also wrong on the part of the man that put them in that situation )
It’s not that women tend to lean liberal it is that unmarried women tend to lean liberal.
Yeah the problem boils down to women who have not civilized the men in their lives =P
It’s all about a break down in society
Her response will be, post hoc ergo propter hoc. For some, it is a logical fallacy, for others, the guiding principle in their lives. ;)
No actually, her response might sting your ears from all the factual words that come out of her mouth.....
Game over, man.
Much of what you posted can be laid at the feet of feminizm.
Women teachers in the classroom are but one part of the underlying problem of the feminization of our boys and young men.
No you are being fooled because you don’t really understand their tactics.
Feminism is just another dagger thrown at conservatism.
You see in order for progressives to succeed they must divide in order to conquer . Why because it is led by men who lack in the physical department but find a great need to control others (the type of guy who doesn’t really believe in anything and would rather fight you with a pen than a sword and wants to control everything you do )
The progressive movement was not led by women. It was led by learned men , the over schooled university type that never learned to quite be a physical man (please go look up what Woodrow Wilson was and you will bet a better understanding of what I am talking about )
They have systematically divided this country in order to gain power.
To gain power they had to break up the family structure.
They first started with blacks in this country (why because they thought less of them )Wilson is the father of segregation .. before him black Americans on the whole were very conservative and quite active in the federal government. He started kicking them out and forcing them into segregated offices/areas etc for to quote “their own good “ (most black Americans used to be Republicans )
They segregated blacks to make them lesser and then started with their social experiments in their communities by writing laws that encourage the breaking up of their families . Welfare laws have always encourage women to not have a man around - the government is now the man/provider ... these laws are written this way just for that purpose ... so the progressives can now be seen as their champions
(there are more whites on welfare than any other race today so please don’t blame people of other shades for this)
Now onto the women and the liberal men who want to dip their stick with no responsibility .. their answer ... pro choice (yeah if you go kill that baby I don’t have to hear it whine and I don’t have to take care of it and can go find me another woman to play with later )
So what do you end up with .. bitter women
but look how many men (liberals)champion this
again this is the way they divide and conquer
Women teachers are not the problem . Where you not raised and taught by your mother ? Did your momma turn you into a sissy boy ? Of course not
Women have always been the ones who have raised and taught the young ones ... traditionally men usually didn’t teach until the university level.
The difference today is you have a lot of LIBERALS(progressives) in these teaching positions and setting the policy of what is being taught .
They have removed God and order from the classroom and are no longer teaching children to reason... this is the exact outcome they want because it is exactly what will benefit them the most.
Zzzing! :-D Good one there, mnehring!
Yeah, they are. They're the chest-thumping types who sit around and boast a bunch of BS at people while deep down inside, they're afraid of us.
We call 'em the "Ballcap and Belly" crowd.
Thank goodness, the majority of FReeper men tend to be gentlenmen who are comfortable with who they are.
My daughter said the same thing when she was 17 years old. When I tried to point out the great women we’ve had serve in the government ranging from Margaret Thatcher to Elizabeth Dole plus all the smart girls like her who knew the score and voted accordingly, she countered with “Yeah, Dad, but for everyone like me who can think logically, there are at least five who can’t even think at all!”
I’d forgotten what a stink this raised. FR used to have good posters, seems to have degraded, like the clown who thinks I’m against Sarah Palin. I said no such thing.
The right to vote and the right to hold any job are not the same.
The original intent was to allow LANDHOLDERS the right to vote, and that would have included blacks as well pre-1776.
Your daughter nailed it 100%.
FR is a shadow of it’s past, it was extremely dynamic back in ‘97 and leading to the Klintoon impeachment.
It was good logic. Today, I think some adaptation would be necessary to include those who paid taxes, such as payroll taxes. Each taxing authority would be required to mail the taxcpayer a receipt which would be proof of voting eligibility through the next election cycle. Payroll tax receipts would be in only one name, but the property tax receipt could be in the names of all age-eligible members of the household and, thus, be proof of voter eligibility.
Yeah, ACORN could try to register 100 winos at the same address, but they would have the added inconvenience of putting all those winos on the property records and dealing witht the occassional wino who would want to sell his share for a fifth of firewater.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.