Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Court: Miss Cal USA Carrie Prejean used homosexual as an insult ("all men with mustaches are gay")
New York Daily News ^ | Thursday, May 7th 2009 | Tracy Miller

Posted on 05/07/2009 9:47:12 AM PDT by presidio9

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-109 next last
To: presidio9

Whoa, they are really out to destroy her. And Sarah. And Sarah’s daughter.

Such vicious misogyny.


41 posted on 05/07/2009 10:03:33 AM PDT by bboop (obama, little o, not a Real God)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Revolting cat!

Right. Next you're telling me this guy was gay. Poofters don't rock that hard.

Bonus Trivia: Freddie Mercury was one of the last of the Zoroastrians, who are dying out because the are from Iran, and they can only marry within their religion.

42 posted on 05/07/2009 10:03:51 AM PDT by presidio9 ("a stable once had something inside it that was bigger than our whole world," -Lucy Pevensie)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: presidio9; a fool in paradise
Do recall that the Rolling Stones never had moustaches!


43 posted on 05/07/2009 10:04:54 AM PDT by Revolting cat! (Let us prey!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

Court papers dated May 16, 2000, include the following statement from a court-appointed counselor: “The mother also alleges the father told the girls their stepfather was gay, that all men with mustaches are gay.”

***

OK so Carrie would have been what, 12 years old at the time this was noted in court? And she’s being called on the carpet for something her father supposidly said which came out in divorce court nearly 10 years ago while she was still in elementary school?

This has gone beyond stupid.


44 posted on 05/07/2009 10:04:55 AM PDT by bereanway (Sarah get your gun)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

So now they are digging into divorce records and publishing them.

These are the same people who think its wrong to wire-tap a terrorist, but they’ll trash your privacy anytime they want to.


45 posted on 05/07/2009 10:05:25 AM PDT by marron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LeonardFMason

Here’s something interesting and of course not reported as part of this story. She is saying nothing different than what obama has said several times during the campaign - he thinks and has spoken the words, “that marriage is between a man and a woman”. Where is the press, or should I say the fag, outrage on his words.


46 posted on 05/07/2009 10:05:35 AM PDT by Cyclone59 (I just can’t WAIT until the ‘60s generation is out of power and drooling in nursing homes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: lewisglad

47 posted on 05/07/2009 10:06:19 AM PDT by presidio9 ("a stable once had something inside it that was bigger than our whole world," -Lucy Pevensie)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Revolting cat!

48 posted on 05/07/2009 10:06:54 AM PDT by a fool in paradise (If Liberals are so upset over torture, why did they mock John McCains stiff arms during the campaign)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

They are just going to keep beating her up until she feels it’s not worth it any longer.

Typical left thuggery and method of personal destruction.


49 posted on 05/07/2009 10:07:12 AM PDT by NavySEAL F-16
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Revolting cat!

50 posted on 05/07/2009 10:07:38 AM PDT by a fool in paradise (If Liberals are so upset over torture, why did they mock John McCains stiff arms during the campaign)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: DManA

Yep I have 4 teen neices and nephews and that is probably the most common put down they use on a constant basis. IMHO no matter what the gays want, they are never going to convince this generation that what they do is normal!


51 posted on 05/07/2009 10:07:48 AM PDT by chris_bdba
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Revolting cat!

52 posted on 05/07/2009 10:07:51 AM PDT by presidio9 ("a stable once had something inside it that was bigger than our whole world," -Lucy Pevensie)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

Pathetic attack. There is nothing inappropriate about the pictures I’ve seen. This is like the attacks on Governor Palin, but somehow more trivial.


53 posted on 05/07/2009 10:08:04 AM PDT by TurtleUp (Turtle up: cancel optional spending until 2012, and boycott TARP/stimulus companies forever!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

“Plus her answer at the pagent wasn’t “anti-gay” anyway. She basically said that marriage was between a man and a woman for her, but that we live in a great country where people get to choose.”

I quite agree with your point, as you stated it, but what’s clear is that, for the screamers, this is another exercise in word “re-definition” or “word bifurcation” as I sometimes call it. The gays aren’t satisifed with being allowed to marry; in most cases, they can indeed achieve the functional equivalent. No, it is the very definition of the term “marriage” they insist on. YOU, YOU must change your ways/way of thinking. YOU are the one under attack for your bigoted, homophobic views. Maybe you have moderated your instinctive or reflexive views of homosexuals BUT IT AIN’T ENOUGH. Despite the work you’ve done on yourself, YOU are the intolerant one.

just like:

old: Out-of-control spending
new: Investment


54 posted on 05/07/2009 10:08:31 AM PDT by Attention Surplus Disorder (Mr. Bernanke, have you started working on your book about the second GREATER depression?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

Movie roles, playing fags, that’s all!


55 posted on 05/07/2009 10:10:12 AM PDT by Revolting cat! (Let us prey!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: presidio9
Right. Next you're telling me this guy was gay. Poofters don't rock that hard.

I can't see the picture (blocked by firewall) but it's Freddie Mercury, right?

I didn't realize you were joking.

First I find out Dom Deluise ISN'T gay.

Then, I find out David Ogden Stiers IS gay,

Then, I hear Freddie Mercury isn't gay?

What's next? My Pringles less than perfectly stacked?

56 posted on 05/07/2009 10:11:02 AM PDT by End Times Sentinel (In Memory of my Dear Friend Henry Lee II)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: yldstrk
ever heard “gnarly”?

Going back even further "scuzzy!"

57 posted on 05/07/2009 10:11:40 AM PDT by KosmicKitty (WARNING: Hormonally crazed woman ahead!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: presidio9
OK, I read the entire article - twice...
Someone please show me what information in the article supports the headline that Miss Prejean is the one who used homosexuality as an insult?

In divorce proceedings from 2000 - 3 days after Miss Prejean turned 13 - they quote court appointed doctors and the father regarding conversations that took place between the mother and father, and between the father and the girls. Nowhere is Carrie Prejean quoted - nowhere.

The discussed confrontation between her parents (within earshot of the girls) took place in 1996 - when Carrie was 9.

And yet, Miss Tracy Miller, the intrepid reporter, somehow feels this information warrants the headline:
Court docs: Miss California USA Carrie Prejean used homosexuality as an insult

And further this information is supposed to support the comment in the article that:
Prejean, (snip), may also have some explaining to do about a series of court documents from her parents' messy, decade-long divorce proceedings.
Really Miss Miller?
Do 9 year old children have to answer for what their parents say during a contested and messy divorce?

I am not an advocate of suing everyone for everything, but I hope that Miss Prejean at least demands a retraction of the headline backed by litigation as necessary. This kind of fabricated headline is tabloid journalism at its worst: such an outrageous unsupported claim is not protected by 'reporting' on someone who has status as a public figure.

58 posted on 05/07/2009 10:12:09 AM PDT by BlueNgold (... Feed the tree!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BlueNgold

“The mother ‘ALLEGES’”. An allegation in a divorce document become a direct quote attributed to a third party for a headline.


59 posted on 05/07/2009 10:13:52 AM PDT by massgopguy (I owe everything to George Bailey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

Isn’t the constituency of the democrap/commiecrat party a sight to see! Such non-judgmental people, such tolerant degenerates they are! [’spittoie’ ... disgusting degenerates celebarte their degeneracy then accuse endlessly when someone not as degenerate as they is sliding toward their state of degeneracy; I suppose the slide isn’t fast enough to suit the dead-souled human sludge such as Perez and his enablers in government and media]


60 posted on 05/07/2009 10:14:31 AM PDT by MHGinTN (Believing they cannot be deceived, they cannot be convinced when they are deceived.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-109 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson