Posted on 05/06/2009 8:30:12 PM PDT by rabscuttle385
Republican stalwarts are fond of recalling the 1992 Democrat National Convention, and the manner in which Bob Casey Sr., the Governor of Pennsylvania, was prevented from giving a speech on account of his strident pro-life views. Here was the incontrovertible proof that Democrats censor and oppress those who do not toe the party line.
What is rarely recalled is that, four years later in the Republican National Convention, the official party policy was to avoid any mention whatsoever of the entire abortion issue. GOP candidate Bob Dole sought to sidestep controversy that party insiders feared might be overly "divisive," since that is how the major media and the Democrats portrayed defining moral issues such as abortion. With the conservative base thoroughly dispirited by this and a host of similar actions, Dole lost that race, leaving the Republicans to flounder for another four years.
Dole's fate was consistent with the pattern of Republican presidential candidates and their regard for conservatism in general. Those who boldly and unabashedly carried the conservative "torch" have done well, while any who attempt to "move to the center" and "find common ground" with the left will be abandoned by conservative voters. John McCain, while claiming to do both, succeeded at neither. And his electoral results proved it.
Herein lies the picture of a losing Republican "strategy" to which its liberal members doggedly cling, despite results that have been consistently disastrous over the years. Every attempt to water down the GOP platform, in a futile quest to widen its appeal, has had exactly the opposite effect. Seeking to portray themselves as standing for everything, such self-serving party insiders are rightly recognized as standing for nothing.
Nevertheless, an infuriatingly effective ruse from media liberals and Democrat political hacks has been to convince congressional Republicans to "moderate" (read: accommodate the liberal agenda). When voters exhibit their outrage by abandoning such Republicans at the polls, those same Democrats assert loudly that the party is still "too conservative" and thus needs to drink more of the poison that has been killing it. Cowardice, whether in day to day life or in the political arena, is by definition easy to manipulate. Thus the most timid Republicans can be counted upon to follow this lead.
Arlen Specter's recent official abandonment of the Republican Party (as opposed to the unofficial manner in which he has been doing so for years) provides a powerful case in point. Since Specter made his announcement to switch to the Democrats, liberal activists such as James Carville have predictably insisted that the move represents undeniable proof of an excessively narrow governing philosophy among the Republicans. Thus, we are told, the only winning strategy is for the GOP to move even further left, in order to accommodate the likes of Specter.
"Conventional wisdom," stubbornly promoted by the ruling class on both sides of the aisle, insists that the ultimate purpose of a political party is to get its members elected to office. In truth, such a notion represents defining evidence of a party in decline. The founding purpose of a political party is always to advance a particular set of ideas. The chances of those ideas being adopted as public policy will increase with greater popular support and the strength that lies in numbers, a party is established to move the particular banner forward.
Unfortunately, at some point along the way, those doing the moving and shaking inevitably shift their focus from "the cause" to their own fortunes, at which point the true ideology that undergirded their formation into a party is likely to take a back seat to the presumed pragmatism of the moment.
It is at this juncture that the present day Republican Party is completely foundering, and will continue to do so unless its reins can be seized by a cabal of true conservatives who are neither willing to accept a thoroughly biased view of the world as presented on the nightly news, or cowed by the inevitable personal attacks against them from the left. Efforts to make the party more appealing by mimicking the Democrats will neither ingratiate the party to the news anchors nor inspire voters to rally to it. Who could be expected to derive inspiration from a cheap imitation of the hard-left, when the real thing is readily available from the Democrats?
It is wholly frustrating to the conservative base that the road to Republican victory lies so blatantly in front of myopic party insiders, yet they refuse to recognize it. In the wake of Bill Clinton's 1992 electoral mandate with its "resounding" forty-eight percent of the vote, Newt Gingrich rallied his party to adopt a conservative manifesto known as the "Contract With America." Despite media coverage that was universally disparaging, Gingrich led the Republicans to a stunning victory in the 1994 mid-term elections.
Had Gingrich remained true to his principles, he may well have thoroughly routed the Democrats, including Bill Clinton, in 1996. It was only when he as House Speaker, along with then Senate Majority Leader Bob Dole, essentially validated Clinton's fiscally excessive policies by caving in to him on the 1995 budget showdown that Republican momentum was rebuffed.
A similar opportunity exists for Republicans now, if a sufficient number have the courage and forthrightness to recognize and seize upon it. Americans are no more enthused at the prospect of Republican "cooperation" with the left than they were in 2006 or 2008. And despite media stories to the contrary, a considerable backlash against the severe overindulgences of the Obama Administration looms.
Whether or not that sentiment ever coalesces into a renewed Republican vitality will depend solely on the character of party leaders, who can either listen to the discredited "moderate experts" and consign themselves to permanent minority status, or seize the moment on behalf of traditional America and ride it to victory.
© Chris Adamo
A must read.
Hope so! That way (some) Conservatives will stop whining about “we need to take back the party” and start forming a new one.
“Divisive”? You better believe things like abortion (and gun control, and socialism) are divisive. Right and wrong are always divisive.
I know that for every conservative who wants to say they will never vote for a republican in the general election if they aren’t conservative, there is a moderate who says they will never vote for a conservative republican in the general election.
Which is fine, nobody has to vote for anybody, but you will never be in the majority if you refuse a majority vote. It pisses me off when a conservative wins a fairly-fought primary and the moderates refuse to accept the results, and I imagine that moderates get similarly pissed off if they win the primary and conservatives walk away.
But I know who DOESN’T get pissed off — the democrats, who find elections easy pickings when the conservatives and moderates of the republican party refuse to support each other’s candidates in the general elections.
There are certainly candidates that are so far out of the republican mainstream that we are better off letting the democrats win (Chafee and Specter, anybody?)
And for those conservatives who are happy to never win another election, that’s fine — I’m not asking anybody to give up their principles, just making sure they understand what their principles and actions mean.
When I go into a general election, I vote for the person who has a chance of winning who will do the least damage, which almost always will be the republican candidate. With any luck, the primary will have chosen a conservative, but if there are no solid conservatives in the general election, I still don’t want the liberal democrat to win.
Because if 2006-2008 has shown us nothing else, it is that democrats who have the power to control the agenda in washington ARE much worse than RINO republicans stabbing us in the back.
Just one guy’s opinion, but I find all the red highlighting distracting.
Dole was actually a fairly descent guy, and fairly conservative. But for some reason he let himself be persuaded by the party handlers and “experts” that he should shut up about abortion.
In fact, it was worse than that. After Ralph Reed of the Moral Majority had pretty well put him over the top single-handedly against Pat Buchanan—who seemed at that time to be the more conservative candidate but had some problems that later became much more evident—Dole turned on the Moral Majority in his acceptance speech and as good as told them to get lost.
So, they did get lost. The didn’t vote for clinton, but neither did the vote for Dole. They stayed home by the millions. Dole was an idiot to do that, because as I said to begin with, he was a pretty decent guy who could have been a real conservative. He was a war hero, he had good instincts, he was (I think) pretty conservative, but he let his handlers wreck his campaign.
And they did the same thing to George Bush, who at least was stubborn on the life issues and defense but gave in everywhere else.
Ralph Reed, of course, was disowned by the Moral Majority, which never really recovered.
McCain’s defeat made us stronger, not only because it stripped us of the always-lose game of The Party In Charge, but proved once and for all that realpolitik is the cause of ineffectual government.
"Conventional wisdom," stubbornly promoted by the ruling class on both sides of the aisle, insists that the ultimate purpose of a political party is to get its members elected to office. In truth, such a notion represents defining evidence of a party in decline. The founding purpose of a political party is always to advance a particular set of ideas. The chances of those ideas being adopted as public policy will increase with greater popular support and the strength that lies in numbers, a party is established to move the particular banner forward.
The Whig Party could never quite find its footing, because it was united only by its desire to win office. Several regional leaders vied for power.. W.H. Harrison, a figurehead was installed as President with Clay as his expected successor as Sec. of State, but after Harrison died after a month in office, he was succeeded by an anti-Jackson Democrat, Tyler, who soon broke with Clay. Clay narrowly lost in 1844 because the issue of slavery reared its head and a third party candidate cost Clay the state of New York and the Presidency. The Mexican War raised slavery to the forefront and it eventually destroyed both national parties, but the Whigs first. The Republican Party was created in reaction to the collapse of the Whigs in the push for the expansion of slavery.
I’m sorry you feel that way!
Sometimes a man HAS to choose wether he is willing to fight or just go along. Some of us heve reached that breaking point to fight.
I’m not going to bore you with a litany of reasons because it would do no good.
My breaking point has been reached, so I will do what I can do and hold my head proudly knowing that I fought as hard as I could!
What will you do?
21% of the electorate currently identify themselves as Republican. We aren’t in a position to purge the party of anyone. Can we win a few elections first before we go on a witch hunt?
Bump!
Was the 1996 convention the one where Governor Weld (RINO-Mass) was surrounded by a group of conservatives chanting “Libertine...Libertine...Libertine”?
Sorry ‘bout that. I’ll try to stick to black highlighting next time :-)
I could not agree more, CharlesWayneCT. Well said and spot on!
Up until now, I’ve been a complete scoffer regarding the feasibility of an effective new third party (and it WOULD be extremely difficult to pull off), but I;m beginningto entertainthe idea seriously. If the conservatives the the GOP, they’d get 15% of the vote, max. With only one Conservative Partyin 3-way races,a plurality could be possible. The RINO GOP would be made up of 5% left-leaning independents, 5% Cautious Democrats, and 5% RINOs. Most of these people vote Democrat in actual elections.
Not only NO, but HELL, NO!!!!!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.