To: svcw
I would rather be around someone who is stoned than someone who is drunk.
_____________________________
Then you haven’t seen NHTSA studies comparing drunk vs. stoned drivers.
To: Responsibility2nd
What a desperate argument. No one is advocating driving under the influence of any substance.
Back in the day I drank and smoked pot, now I do neither.
I never embarrassed my self or got into trouble while under the influence of pot, can't say the same for alcohol
43 posted on
05/05/2009 2:54:26 PM PDT by
Las Vegas Ron
(I'd rather the world hate us then laugh at us)
To: Responsibility2nd
Did I say that either should be driving? No.
45 posted on
05/05/2009 2:55:48 PM PDT by
svcw
(There are 10 kinds of people in the world: Those who know binary and those who don't.)
To: Responsibility2nd
Can you provide citations for the NHTSA studies?
65 posted on
05/05/2009 3:11:41 PM PDT by
starlifter
(Sapor Amo Pullus)
To: Responsibility2nd; All
I don’t know anyone that does not do both; smoke pot and have booze at the same time. I have seen people drink and not smoke pot but I have never seen someone smoke pot and not drink so it would be an interesting study.
84 posted on
05/05/2009 4:13:51 PM PDT by
edcoil
(Taxes only help an evil government)
To: Responsibility2nd
I’m suspecting that driving while stoned would still be illegal. ;)
146 posted on
05/06/2009 8:30:19 AM PDT by
RobRoy
(I'm wearing a cast on one hand. My spelling and clarity may not be up to par right now.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson