Skip to comments.
D.C. Council Votes to Recognize Same-Sex Marriages Performed in Other States
Washington Post ^
| May 5., 2009
| Tim Craig
Posted on 05/05/2009 9:02:07 AM PDT by Bokababe
Washington Post reporter Tim Craig relays that the D.C. Council has voted 13-0, without debate, to recognize same-sex marriages performed in other states. Watch D.C. Wire for updates.
(Excerpt) Read more at voices.washingtonpost.com ...
TOPICS: Breaking News; Culture/Society; Government; US: District of Columbia
KEYWORDS: antibiblicalmarriage; celebratesin; culturewar; dc; fauxmarriage; federalism; homonaziagenda; homosexualagenda; marionbarry; samesexmarriage; unbiblicalmarriage
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-96 next last
1
posted on
05/05/2009 9:02:07 AM PDT
by
Bokababe
To: Bokababe
2
posted on
05/05/2009 9:03:31 AM PDT
by
edcoil
(Taxes only help an evil government)
To: Bokababe
What a surprise!
And the Nation’s Capital steps down to a lower ring of Hell.
Well done, DC. Well done.
3
posted on
05/05/2009 9:03:44 AM PDT
by
RexBeach
("Do your duty in all things." Robert E. Lee)
To: RexBeach
So what’s Barney Frank’s excuse for not getting married now?
4
posted on
05/05/2009 9:04:42 AM PDT
by
a fool in paradise
(IRONY - we know more about the First Dog's historical papers than we do of President Barack.)
To: Bokababe
So when do they recognize my Florida State concealed weapons permit?
5
posted on
05/05/2009 9:05:12 AM PDT
by
bill1952
(Power is an illusion created between those with power - and those without)
To: a fool in paradise
He does not want to make it public that he is sleeping with mortgage lenders?
6
posted on
05/05/2009 9:05:35 AM PDT
by
Kansas58
To: Bokababe
This is ripe for a vote in Congress.
This will force Congress and Obama to make a stand they do not want to make.
7
posted on
05/05/2009 9:06:15 AM PDT
by
Kansas58
To: Bokababe
While DC believes in the right to choose in the cases of abortion and gay marriage, they still don’t like having people the right to own guns and let their kids get vouchers to send them to better performing private schools.
8
posted on
05/05/2009 9:07:31 AM PDT
by
MAD-AS-HELL
(Hope and Change. Rhetoric embraced by the Insane - Obama, The Chump in Charge)
To: Bokababe
To: Kansas58
The inmates are running the asylum.
To: Bokababe
I know that I am in the minority here and will likely get slammed for what I am about to say, but I'll say it anyway. It is not for government to decide what is or isn't "a marriage". All that government should be involved in is recognizing a legal partnership. Defining "marriage" should be left to priests, rabbis, clergy and even the individuals themselves. Giving the concept of "marriage" over to a secular government to define is like asking whores to define the concept of "purity".
There is really no way to win this "marriage" issue with politicians in this day and age -- except to take the issue out of their hands-- but people just keep trying.
11
posted on
05/05/2009 9:12:37 AM PDT
by
Bokababe
(Save Christian Kosovo! http://www.savekosovo.org)
To: Bokababe
Well then you have to get government out of tax issues (or get rid of the IRS as te same time) becuase the priary reason that government is in the business of recognizing marriage is for Taxes/tax filings.
12
posted on
05/05/2009 9:14:43 AM PDT
by
JSDude1
(DHS, FBI, FEMA, etc have been bad little boys. They need to be spanked and sent to timeout!)
To: bill1952
Exactly right. I’d love to see the NRA jump all over this one.
13
posted on
05/05/2009 9:17:26 AM PDT
by
rintense
(Go Israel!)
To: Constitution Day
“Abomination.”
And as such, God fearing men and women who wish to marry shold exclude any acknowledgment or participation by the deviant loving state in the process.
14
posted on
05/05/2009 9:19:19 AM PDT
by
TalBlack
To: Kansas58
He doesn’t want to GET married. He wants approval for him to get married. It is about knocking down barriers, not about morality of living in a committed relationship vs. unmarried sin.
15
posted on
05/05/2009 9:25:47 AM PDT
by
a fool in paradise
(IRONY - we know more about the First Dog's historical papers than we do of President Barack.)
To: TalBlack
Why did they decide to recognize gay marriage performed in other places? What about marriages performed in DC? Don’t they decide the marriage laws for DC itself, or is that a Congressional decision?
To: Bokababe
Way to further alienate the people and divide the country DC.
17
posted on
05/05/2009 9:26:39 AM PDT
by
gidget7
(Duncan Hunter-Valley Forge Republican!)
To: JSDude1
It isn’t just government that recognized marriages. If your employer gives medical benefits, your spouse also is elligible.
However many firms also offer benefits for unmarried domestic partners (at least of same sex couples).
18
posted on
05/05/2009 9:27:33 AM PDT
by
a fool in paradise
(IRONY - we know more about the First Dog's historical papers than we do of President Barack.)
To: Bokababe
Well, I guess that’s good news for Barney Frank and Lindsay Graham.
19
posted on
05/05/2009 9:33:07 AM PDT
by
rabscuttle385
("If this be treason, then make the most of it!" —Patrick Henry)
To: Bokababe
no longer slouching.....sprinting.....
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-96 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson