Also see:
SITREP
The Kaibab formation in the southwest is well known and an ancient sea is the reason there are marine fossil deposits in Arizona.
“To form such a vast fossil graveyard required 24 cubic miles (100 km3) of lime sand and silt, flowing in a thick, soup-like slurry at more than 16 feet (5 m) per second (more than 11 mph [18 km/h]) to catastrophically overwhelm and bury this huge, living population of nautiloids.”
Or it could be an ancient sea bed deposit which i stated above. This is an example of misinformation and manipulating data, if there was any data at all. Does this statement actually make any sense? It gives a distance/time rather than a volume/time. How did they know the width and height of the “slurry?” How do they know the amount of time it took to flow. Sounds like they made up information to fit their data.
“We find rock layers that can be traced all the way across continents—even between continents—and physical features in those strata indicate they were deposited rapidly.”
They are repeating the theory of continental drift but stating the cause is a flood. If the gravel really was swept off of one continent coast why would it travel all the way into Arizona in it's final resting place rather than being deposited mainly into the deepest point. Would we not see evidence of the rock being left behind in some places? Yes we would...if a flood were the cause.
If anyone would like to defend this article, please feel free to do so.
Thanks for the ping!
Genesis happened, got a problem with it, Take it up with God.