for the Democrats, even as he blames his actions on conservatives,
causing him to laugh at what a carpetbagging, backstabbing, liberal whore he is.
The man in his personal life has always conducted his life as a conservative.
So he is not geared or good at walking the minefields of politics and leaves himself vulnerable and is taken out of context.
His brain most of his life has been wired in Corporate Business and how to solve problems as he lives a proper life but has a hard time now making the shift in how to allow others to exercise their free agency, and at the same time wade through this insane world.
Many are confused or don’t like how or his views in politics but to trash his personal life calling him baby killer when he never had abortions nor signed a bill to such and even annoyed some in his flock when he would try hard to council a women to carry her child to full term.
To call his health care socialized health care when it was in the private sector. Yes the state also was involved on a certain level but that was starry decisis way before Mitts time and there was no way around it just like in other state of the union and if one is in a Marxist state it is that much harder.
It was foolish of him to try to implement his programs in such a Marxist state these vipers do not play fair and will ate one for lunch.
He should have run in Utah but it was really no challenge like Mass where at least trying to buck the system.
My point is so you don’t like your perception of his run for office, but to try to also include and reach into his private life how he lived his personally with that of the world yammers for is not good it is not doing the right thing!
Most Democratic politicians have likely never triggered personal abortions in their relationships. But that doesn't mean the bulk of them aren't pro-abortion.
Romney has set the Republican executive record for sanctity of life waffles!
And would that not make him a hypocrite since publically there is ample evidence he has not been conservative in his political decisions more than a few times?
And despite all of your holier than thou bluster,you are ok with that.
Amazing...
Makes the rest of your post pretty much moot..
What? How "private" is it when govt. plants a Planned Parenthood member as a permanent board member of overseeing RomneyCare? How "private" is it when govt expands abortion by paying for it as if it was a "medical" act.
MINDreading again??
With the exception of people like the Clintons, Kennedys, Obamas and a few others, most liberals conduct their personal lives as conservatives. Myth governed as a liberal.
He should have run in Utah but it was really no challenge like Mass where at least trying to buck the system.
Myth COULD'T run in Utah, it would have been the end of his political career.
In Utah, Myth's Mormonism wouldn't have even been an issue (and it really wasn't on the national level either) and the conservative Mormons and non-Mormons in Utah would have immediately seen Myth for the liberal that he was. He never would have gotten the nomination.
So, Myth went to Massachusetts, ran as the liberal that he is and governed as the liberal that he is.
In January, the Dakota Voice published an excerpt from the Washington DC Examiner on how MA offered a HealthCare model disaster! See massachusetts-health-care-a-model-for-disaster
Here's an excerpt: The Washington DC Examiner editorial on Jan. 11 paints a far less than rosy picture of the alleged socialist utopia in Mass. In fact, they call it “an embarrassing flop.”
Among the problems…
State insurers jacking up rates to twice the national average. The piece says 43 mandatory benefits, which many people didn’t want or need, have driven up costs 56%. Does everyone need invitro fertilization? Do most? Do more than a handful?
Small businesses with more than 10 employees were forced to provide benefits to their employees or be slammed with a tax
Costs of the program came in 85% higher than projected
Because payments to health care providers were slashed in an effort to slow down the hemorrhaging budget, providers quit taking on new patients, resulting in waits of more than a year for a simple exam.
And you have the gall to call it "private sector" healthcare? Do you want RomneyCare nation-wide?
Hey, taxpayers do you want to pay for even more abortions that we'll answer to God for? Hey, taxpayers, do you want Planned Parenthood people chartered to oversee a nationwide version of RomneyCare?