Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Homosexuals Get New Protections under House Bill
CNS News ^ | April 29, 2009 | Larry Margasak

Posted on 04/29/2009 4:00:23 PM PDT by DesertRenegade

Gay victims of violence would gain new federal protections under a revived and expanded hate crimes bill passed by the House. Conservatives strongly objected but lacked the votes to stop the legislation.

The bill could provide a financial bonanza to state and local authorities, with federal grants to help pay for prosecution of hate crimes. The federal government could step in and prosecute if states requested it or declined to exercise their authority.

A weaker bill died two years ago under a veto threat from President George W. Bush. But President Barack Obama urged support before the vote.

Democratic Sen. Edward Kennedy of Massachusetts has introduced the Senate's version of the legislation.

The House bill added protections based on sexual orientation, gender, gender identity and disability.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 111th; antichristian; bho44; bhohomosexualagenda; endoffreespeech; homonaziagenda; homosexualagenda; homosexuality; homosexuals; nofreespeech; pelosi; sodomy; specialrights
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-34 next last
Quite a few pastors are saying they can now be arrested just for speaking out against the vile homosexual lifestyle choice. We are living in truly sick times when the homosexual militants have succeeded in literally outlawing morality and basic decency.
1 posted on 04/29/2009 4:00:23 PM PDT by DesertRenegade
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: DesertRenegade

I wonder how long it will be before Christian pastors actually end up in court. Unfortunately, I would bet there are gay activists out there who have already picked their targets.


2 posted on 04/29/2009 4:05:39 PM PDT by ChocChipCookie (Earth: It's not your mother, it's just a big rock.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DesertRenegade

Homosexuals Get New Protections under House Frank


3 posted on 04/29/2009 4:06:18 PM PDT by Voter62vb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DesertRenegade

When you take into account things like “gerbiling”, “fisting”, “golden showers”, fudge-packing, and the other sick, twisted behaviors that constitute homosexual sex, it sounds more like a lifestyle of torture and humiliation.

Maybe we should let the Guantanamo detainees loose in the gay bars of San Fran Sicko. They’ll be begging for the days of waterboarding.


4 posted on 04/29/2009 4:08:30 PM PDT by Westbrook (Having more children does not divide your love, it multiplies it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DesertRenegade
Homosexuals Get New Protections under House Bill

I suspect that this is a piece of trojan legislation intended to sneak something in through the back door...

5 posted on 04/29/2009 4:08:36 PM PDT by snarks_when_bored
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Voter62vb

House Franks Hetrosexuals without protection.


6 posted on 04/29/2009 4:08:37 PM PDT by Einherjar (PEACE THROUGH SUPERIOR FIREPOWER)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: DesertRenegade

What they have done is said that if you are a white, straight, male..........you have no rights.


7 posted on 04/29/2009 4:09:05 PM PDT by RC2 (FREEDOM)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DesertRenegade

This bill is unconstitutional - all you have to do is file an injuction against it and let SCOTUS rule on this.


8 posted on 04/29/2009 4:11:12 PM PDT by Extremely Extreme Extremist ("President Obama, your agenda is not new, it's not change, and it's not hope" - Rush Limbaugh 02/28)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: snarks_when_bored
It allows many to reach around the current rules the buttress our society...
9 posted on 04/29/2009 4:18:38 PM PDT by LachlanMinnesota
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist

It will indeed get to SCOTUS if it passes. We still have hope.

I am not advocating criminal activity against any person, homosexual or otherwise. But I think assault should be assault, not accentuated by the moral or political mindset of the assaulter.


10 posted on 04/29/2009 4:19:28 PM PDT by Marie2 (Jesus, take the wheel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: DesertRenegade

11 posted on 04/29/2009 4:24:17 PM PDT by Bean Counter (Stout Hearts....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LachlanMinnesota

Further analysis of this legislation will certainly be coming...


12 posted on 04/29/2009 4:26:12 PM PDT by snarks_when_bored
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: DesertRenegade
A weaker bill died two years ago under a veto threat from President George W. Bush. But President Barack Obama urged support before the vote.

Just goes to show JUST HOW RIGHT all those Freepers were that said there wasn't a shade of defference between GWB and a Democrat.

13 posted on 04/29/2009 4:29:34 PM PDT by Balding_Eagle (Willful ignorance is a dangerous attitude.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DesertRenegade

Just follow what has happened in Canada, when the same kind of law was passed.


14 posted on 04/29/2009 4:32:58 PM PDT by svcw (There are 10 kinds of people in the world: Those who know binary and those who don't.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DesertRenegade

The bombs bursting in AIR!!!


15 posted on 04/29/2009 4:33:10 PM PDT by longun45 (Still think a revolution cannot happen here?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Balding_Eagle

Are you saying GWB threatened to veto the bill 2 years ago because it wasn’t strong enough?

Just exactly what do you mean?


16 posted on 04/29/2009 4:37:35 PM PDT by zipper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Marie2
But I think assault should be assault, not accentuated by the moral or political mindset of the assaulter.

The goal of this is to politicize crime. From there it is a short step to create "thought crimes" that are solely political.

17 posted on 04/29/2009 4:43:40 PM PDT by Wilhelm Tell (True or False? This is not a tag line.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: DesertRenegade
The priests/pastors need to stage an open and continuous MLK like passive resistance attack on this legislation. Challenge it not by sitting in diners and on buses but by lecturing every Sunday and at every service, in part or in total, about and against the sin of this disease. They need to put themselves up collectively, to be persecuted and prosecuted. Make it so large the MSM cannot ignore it. See if the government is willing to arrest and jail thousands if not tens and hundreds of thousands of priests/pastors in every city of every state.
I don't hold out hope it will happen but it is the only way to send a meaningful message to our representatives who since the passage of the stimulus/porkulus bill, have collectively given their constituents the finger.
18 posted on 04/29/2009 4:49:38 PM PDT by Tucson (I'd prefer you just say thank you; or pick up a piece and walk a post)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DesertRenegade

so... if i want to avoid the verbal, stereotypical and financial attacks... i would want to change from my current status of employed white male to unemployed black homosexual undocumented male citizen.

check

would that allow me to avoid giving tax money to fuel the good ship 0bama? how about just paying for 3 of the last 5+ years?

also, does this mean i want to wear the pink shirt with the black face as a sign of solidarity with ‘da man’, or the dirty field shirt?


19 posted on 04/29/2009 4:50:33 PM PDT by sten
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChocChipCookie
There's a big difference in adding penalties for incorrect thought while committing a crime of violence, and "incorrect" thought being merely expressed as free speech.

Racial discrimination has been outlawed for at least forty years, and hate crime penalties (as much as I despise them) have been assessed in many jurisdictions. Yet, I don't know of anyone who has been arrested or convicted for making a racial joke, or advocating racial separation.

20 posted on 04/29/2009 4:53:39 PM PDT by hunter112 (SHRUG - Stop Hussein's Radical Utopian Gameplan!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-34 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson