Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Specter's statement: "Not defined" by party
Politico via Drudge ^ | April 28, 2009 | Arlen Specter

Posted on 04/28/2009 9:26:22 AM PDT by pillut48

Statement by Senator Arlen Specter

I have been a Republican since 1966. I have been working extremely hard for the Party, for its candidates and for the ideals of a Republican Party whose tent is big enough to welcome diverse points of view. While I have been comfortable being a Republican, my Party has not defined who I am. I have taken each issue one at a time and have exercised independent judgment to do what I thought was best for Pennsylvania and the nation.

Since my election in 1980, as part of the Reagan Big Tent, the Republican Party has moved far to the right. Last year, more than 200,000 Republicans in Pennsylvania changed their registration to become Democrats. I now find my political philosophy more in line with Democrats than Republicans.

Since then, I have traveled the State, talked to Republican leaders and office-holders and my supporters and I have carefully examined public opinion. It has become clear to me that the stimulus vote caused a schism which makes our differences irreconcilable. On this state of the record, I am unwilling to have my twenty-nine year Senate record judged by the Pennsylvania Republican primary electorate.

I have not represented the Republican Party.

I have represented the people of Pennsylvania.

I have decided to run for re-election in 2010 in the Democratic primary.

I am ready, willing and anxious to take on all comers and have my candidacy for re-election determined in a general election.

I deeply regret that I will be disappointing many friends and supporters. I can understand their disappointment. I am also disappointed that so many in the Party I have worked for for more than four decades do not want me to be their candidate. It is very painful on both sides.

(Excerpt) Read more at politico.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Extended News; Government; News/Current Events; US: Pennsylvania
KEYWORDS: 111th; agenda; bushlegacy; democrats; dieapainfuldeath; pa2010; pennsylvania; rino; rovelegacy; specter; sphincter; turncoat
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220221 next last
To: fieldmarshaldj

“The man has no principles, but rather, is a politician, period. He’d join the communist party if he thought he’d get elected.”

He just did.
____________
Indeed. I am constantly astounded at the people that are in denial as to what this POS in the WH is all about.


201 posted on 04/28/2009 3:46:10 PM PDT by mojitojoe ( Idiots elected a Marxist ideologue with narcissistic personality disorder & America is dying.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Big_Monkey

On the other hand, Specter is old as dirt and a survivor of two bouts of brain cancer. Him being around for the next general election is not a foregone conclusion.
____________
we can only hope. Karma is a b*tch you know.


202 posted on 04/28/2009 3:47:33 PM PDT by mojitojoe ( Idiots elected a Marxist ideologue with narcissistic personality disorder & America is dying.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: mojitojoe
On the other hand, Specter is old as dirt and a survivor of two bouts of brain cancer

That explains why he survived, he has no brain.

203 posted on 04/28/2009 3:48:10 PM PDT by dfwgator (1996 2006 2008 - Good Things Come in Threes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 202 | View Replies]

To: chuck_the_tv_out
They already have a filibuster majority since he votes with them anyway.

****************

You've got a point.

204 posted on 04/28/2009 3:48:28 PM PDT by trisham (Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: pillut48

I never thought Specter would do something like this - always thought he enjoyed being in the spotlight as a Republican who could be a thorn in the side to his own party or the other in the times when he actually was on the right side to gain himself publicity. It appears he thinks this will help his re-election chances - more selfish than I thought. His words that he is not defined by party begs the question as to why he would even switch - they are hollow words.

In any event, this does not make much difference in the current make up in the Senate functionally...he was never reliable as a filibuster vote. It would be sweet if this results in his ultimate failure to win re-election.


205 posted on 04/28/2009 4:13:53 PM PDT by Republican Wildcat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pillut48

“It has become clear to me that the stimulus vote caused a schism which makes our differences irreconcilable.”

yup yup. I can understand those who aren’t for tax cuts because they believe in a balanced budget. I respect the concord coalition even though I disagree with them. They sincerely believe in fiscal responsibility.
Arlen Specter just wants to bankrupt this country. Shame on him.


206 posted on 04/28/2009 4:14:55 PM PDT by ari-freedom (Fiscal conservatism without social conservatism is dead.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pillut48

The root problem here is that these arrogant, self-serving idiots in DC and many states believe that the welfare of the country is based upon their life-long holding of elected positions. They will do anything to remain in power.


207 posted on 04/28/2009 4:15:46 PM PDT by nufsed (Release the birth certificate, school and passport records.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sudetenland

You are spot on. What did he expect voting for that “stimulus” piece of garbage? He complains that the party has moved “far to the right.” Voting against that hardly required anyone to be “far to the right.” McCain was leading the fight against it, for goodness sake.


208 posted on 04/28/2009 4:20:00 PM PDT by Republican Wildcat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: pillut48

What a loser. I’d say adios, but you were never here! Toomey would have kicked his ass and had not W and other pubbies gone to Pa in ‘04 and campaigned for him, he would not be there today. Good riddance.


209 posted on 04/28/2009 4:25:07 PM PDT by Road Warrior ‘04 (I'll miss President Bush greatly! Palin in 2012!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pillut48

Specter- not defined by party, but by a close synonym of “pond scum.”


210 posted on 04/28/2009 4:34:28 PM PDT by Rockitz (This isn't rocket science- follow the money and you'll find truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: McGruff

I remember that impeachment vote like it was yesterday. He said something along the lines of ‘I’m going to apply Scottish law’ and he was abruptly cut off by the roll caller who barked out ‘Nay’ and moved on to the next Senator.


211 posted on 04/28/2009 4:41:34 PM PDT by eaglestar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

He would have voted with the dems with or without officially switching parties. It matters not whether there is a D or an R next to his name.


212 posted on 04/28/2009 4:48:28 PM PDT by frankiep (Ron Paul was right)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ScottinVA
Each day, on my commute to work, when I see a loaded school bus, I think to myself how those young minds are being soiled by the DNC-NEA network of propagandists who preach the very “ideas” you mentioned. It’s tragic.

Rush today was asking if when Kruschev said "He would bury us" if there was a date given - ha ha. Think he was meaning even with Kruschev dead and gone, did the mandate still hold?
213 posted on 04/28/2009 4:51:37 PM PDT by Cheerio (Barack Hussein 0bama=The Complete Destruction of American Capitalism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 175 | View Replies]

To: nufsed

That’s right. The longer Republicans are in power in Washington, the more they start behaving like Democrats, more liberal on social issues, bigger spenders, etc. But have you ever seen anyone get more conservative (socially or fiscally) after being in Washington for years?


214 posted on 04/28/2009 5:21:39 PM PDT by Sir Clancelot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 207 | View Replies]

To: big truck
I'm not even going to bother, nothing I have to say will matter to this traitor without a conscience. "Course we already know how he voted on the stimulus and how he is going to vote on the big stuff like illegal immigration and the 2nd Amendment.

Sad thing is that after 20 million illegals are legalized any conservative party is out of power for at least our lifetimes. The RNC has no one but itself to blame.

215 posted on 04/28/2009 6:43:55 PM PDT by Eagles6 ( Typical White Guy: Christian, Constitutionalist, Heterosexual, Redneck. (Let them eat arugula!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 188 | View Replies]

To: pillut48

Benidict Arlen says he represents no party?

Why did he jump to the dems instead of the ind party?

Defecter Spectre is a bold face liar!


216 posted on 04/28/2009 6:48:40 PM PDT by Randy Larsen ( BTW, If I offend you! Please let me know, I may want to offend you again!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TMA62

“He claims to take on all comers.....but he won’t want to take on Toomey in the primary.”


You got that right.

Step 1 scare the RINOs...check
Step 2 scare the democrats...next up.
Step 3 scare 0bama....after that.

Sooner or later the demos will get scared. Right now they are (or should be) concerned and confused where the country is.

0bama? He is just too stupid to know anything.


217 posted on 04/28/2009 7:20:20 PM PDT by GreyMountainReagan (Liberals do not view the book 1984 as a warning but as a textbook.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: 11th Commandment

It is SOOOO helpful of Arlen Specter to relieve the beltway Republicans of these moral dilemmas of supporting incumbent RINOs.


218 posted on 04/28/2009 7:22:22 PM PDT by WOSG (Why is Obama trying to bankrupt America with $16 trillion in spending over the next 4 years?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: HawkeyeRepublican
Wonder how McConnell and those other Republican fools in the senate feel now? Remember a week or so ago the “leadership” came out to support Specter over Toomey.

At least now we can call Specter the ex-Rino. Slither on you ex-Rino POS.

219 posted on 04/28/2009 7:30:22 PM PDT by Tail Gunner John
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Tail Gunner John

Just yesterday I returned yet another RNC fund raising request telling them to go to hell for their support of Specter. Specter must have read my response on their flyer.

The RNC is so out of touch with, not just their base, but 49% of America it is jaw dropping. It really is.

RNC...QUIT trying to out democrat the Democrats.


220 posted on 04/28/2009 7:40:13 PM PDT by GreyMountainReagan (Liberals do not view the book 1984 as a warning but as a textbook.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 219 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220221 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson