Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Urgent, full-court press for 'hate crimes' bill
WorldNetDaily.com ^ | April 27, 2009 | Drew Zahn

Posted on 04/28/2009 3:26:13 AM PDT by Man50D

House Democrats have announced a vote could come as early as tomorrow on a "hate crimes" bill that supporters admit might allow federal officials to prosecute Christians who speak out against homosexual behavior.

The Local Law Enforcement Hate Crimes Prevention Act of 2009, or H.R. 1913, passed through committee last week, and according to the Weekly Leader published by the office of House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer, D-Md., the bill joins 14 others that could be brought to the floor for a vote sometime between noon tomorrow and the end of the week.

Meanwhile, advocates for the bill are engaged in a strong push to see it passed.

The Human Rights Campaign, which calls itself the largest national lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender – or LGBT – civil rights organization, has designated April 27-29 for a national call-in campaign, urging supporters to contact Congress and pressure the bill's passage.

"We need more calls to Members of Congress, and we need them right away," said HRC President Joe Solmonese. "It has been ten long years and tens of thousands more victims since the Matthew Shepard Act was first introduced in Congress. We are poised for a presidential signature this year, but lies from the radical right could easily derail our efforts."

(Excerpt) Read more at worldnetdaily.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Maryland
KEYWORDS: 111th; christians; hatecrimes; homonaziagenda; homosexualagenda; hoyer; hr1913
"Instead of treating all crime victims equally, it creates a caste system where select groups, such as gays and lesbians, are given greater priority in the criminal justice system. This is not progress; it is political correctness.

Political correctness is a more euphemistic term for socialism. Congress needs to here our wrath. Capital toll free switchboard numbers:

800-828-0498

877-762-8762
1 posted on 04/28/2009 3:26:13 AM PDT by Man50D
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Politicalmom

Congress critter ping!


2 posted on 04/28/2009 3:27:05 AM PDT by Man50D (Fair Tax, you earn it, you keep it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Man50D

Only to the Zombified left could it possibly even MATTER what someone “feels” as they’re committing a crime - or, worse, DEFINING something a crime or not depending on one’s “feeling”.

But, hey, maybe we can claim that hating conservatives counts as a “hate crime,” and throw all of these worthless scum in jail. :-)


3 posted on 04/28/2009 3:45:14 AM PDT by Pravious
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Man50D

Conservatives seriously don’t have the necessary votes to actually stop “everything leftist” on all of the issues. People mean well by trying to stop this “hate crimes junk”, but it will still pass, because the left doesn’t care about “everything non-leftist”. The total left is too drunk with power to actually care about anything else.


4 posted on 04/28/2009 3:45:17 AM PDT by johnthebaptistmoore (Conservatives obey the rules. Leftists cheat. Who probably has the political advantage?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Man50D
The US is rapidly becoming one big handbasket...
5 posted on 04/28/2009 3:53:04 AM PDT by ejonesie22 (Stupidity has an expiration date 1-20-2013 *(Thanks Nana))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Man50D

CALL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


6 posted on 04/28/2009 3:56:02 AM PDT by blueyon (It is worth taking a stand even if you are standing alone!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Man50D

“Congress needs to hear our wrath”

They need to feel our wrath as well. TERM LIMITS NOW!


7 posted on 04/28/2009 4:02:43 AM PDT by driftdiver (I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Man50D
When are politicians going to finally understand that ALL crimes perpetrated by one human being against another are hate crimes. If someone hits me over the head I'm just as hurt irregardless of whatever the person said while committing the act. Why should my injuries be looked at differently than others who happens to be within a “protected” class? I was always under the impression that justice was supposed to be blind, not blinded by the false pretenses of political correctness.
8 posted on 04/28/2009 4:02:52 AM PDT by RU88 (The false messiah can not change water into wine any more than he can get unity from diversity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pravious

Hate (aka thought) crimes were the way Romans prosecuted Christians.


9 posted on 04/28/2009 4:03:53 AM PDT by driftdiver (I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Man50D

10 posted on 04/28/2009 4:13:41 AM PDT by Vaquero ("an armed society is a polite society" Robert A. Heinlein)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Vaquero

http://quigley.house.gov/2009/04/quigley-co-sponors-first-bill-in-congress-hate-crimes-prevention-act.shtml


11 posted on 04/28/2009 4:18:59 AM PDT by chicagolady (Mexican Elite say: EXPORT Poverty Let the American Taxpayer foot the bill !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Man50D

Folks better be paying attention. This will be used in all kinds of nefarious and unimaginable ways to shut down all dissent & difference of opinions.

Land of the Free??


12 posted on 04/28/2009 4:24:28 AM PDT by Altura Ct.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Man50D

Look at the newspeak - Local Law Enforcement Hate Crimes Prevention Act of 2009

If it is local, why does it need to be nationalized?

The nationalization of criminal law is a mass danger to individual liberty. We need the states to compete on law to maintain liberty.


13 posted on 04/28/2009 4:26:53 AM PDT by 1010RD (First Do No Harm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Man50D

The framework for a fascist police state like the one emerging in the United Kingdom.

I hope my congressman gets the message.


14 posted on 04/28/2009 4:44:30 AM PDT by Nextrush (Sarah Palin is the new Ronald Reagan.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Man50D

Unless the 1st adm to the constitution is stricken this legislation is meaningless. We in the U.S. are guaranteed FREE speech and there is nothing these perverts short of 2/3 majority can do to usurp this right. Unless of course they truly want to instigate war, which actually is probably needed if this anti-freedom “law” is passed.


15 posted on 04/28/2009 4:56:05 AM PDT by sirchtruth (Gravity Of The Situation...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Man50D

This is the left’s crushing of the first amd. Simply redefine disagreeable opinions as “right wing hate speech.”

Welcome to the USSA, comrade. You must learn to love Dear Leader.


16 posted on 04/28/2009 5:21:08 AM PDT by Travis McGee ("Foreign Enemies And Traitors" will be ready the first week of May.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chicagolady

I would like to suggest a Hate Crimes Provention Act, Provention Act.


17 posted on 04/28/2009 5:52:06 AM PDT by Vaquero ("an armed society is a polite society" Robert A. Heinlein)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Man50D
Concidering that this 1) makes Religion a protected category and potential for a hate crime. As well as equating free speech with requirements for frearm, explosive etc. This is really quite ammusing. So how many people still accept Worldnet Daily's "spin" without checking?

`(2) OFFENSES INVOLVING ACTUAL OR PERCEIVED RELIGION, NATIONAL ORIGIN, GENDER, SEXUAL ORIENTATION, GENDER IDENTITY, OR DISABILITY-
`(A) IN GENERAL- Whoever, whether or not acting under color of law, in any circumstance described in subparagraph (B), willfully causes bodily injury to any person or, through the use of fire, a firearm, or an explosive or incendiary device, attempts to cause bodily injury to any person, because of the actual or perceived religion, national origin, gender, sexual orientation, gender identity, or disability of any person-- `(i) shall be imprisoned not more than 10 years, fined in accordance with this title, or both; and `(ii) shall be imprisoned for any term of years or for life, fined in accordance with this title, or both, if--
`(I) death results from the offense; or `(II) the offense includes kidnaping or an attempt to kidnap, aggravated sexual abuse or an attempt to commit aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to kill.

18 posted on 04/28/2009 8:06:19 AM PDT by The_Repugnant_Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson