Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Winstons Julia

I only have a second, so I may come back and respond to this post again to address other issues...

However, I am reminded of the 1913 Flu in that it only affected the 23-46 age set as well (those ages may be slightly off). That flu epidemic went through and killed mothers and fathers, and children were orphaned. Same with older individuals who were in relatively good health. That’s part of the reason this flu is rather scary... In the short articles I’ve read some of they symptoms seem so similar — especially the age group of the fatalities...

Again, sorry I could only address one part of your post. I’ll try to address the rest after I get dinner on the table and eaten. :)


183 posted on 04/25/2009 5:59:37 PM PDT by LibertyRocks ( http://LibertyRocks.wordpress.com ~ ANTI-OBAMA STUFF : http://cafepress.com/NO_ObamaBiden08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 176 | View Replies ]


To: LibertyRocks

see post 197


201 posted on 04/25/2009 6:28:16 PM PDT by antivenom (The messiah turning worthless mortgages into redeemable assets (like water into wine)...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 183 | View Replies ]

To: LibertyRocks

I’m turning 47 in a few weeks. I’m not liking the age range this flu is striking.


316 posted on 04/25/2009 9:56:07 PM PDT by luckystarmom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 183 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson