Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: angkor

Yes, people from India are classified as Asian-Indians to differentiate the term from Ameri-Indians (Native-Americans).

I’ve seen that classification & terminology over the past few years.

It is true that they are not a monolithic voting group, but because the Vietnamese, Filipino, Samoan, Viet Cong, Laotian, and other groups represent small fractions of a percentage, they generally end up lumped together.


36 posted on 04/25/2009 8:19:25 AM PDT by Gemsbok (If wishes were horses, than beggars would ride)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]


To: Gemsbok
It is true that they are not a monolithic voting group, but because the Vietnamese, Filipino, Samoan, Viet Cong, Laotian, and other groups represent small fractions of a percentage, they generally end up lumped together.

Your examples above perfectly illustrate the problem.

The Vietnamese, Khmer, Malay, Thai, and others in the SE Asian region are not of the same ethnicity.

So if one wants to conduct political opinion polls based on the East or Southeast Asia geographical region, that's one thing.

If one then says "Well, it's really a poll of the Asian ethnicity," it is absolutely stupid.

There is no "Asian ethnicity."

40 posted on 04/25/2009 12:05:54 PM PDT by angkor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson