Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

California county D.A. announces he can’t afford to prosecute misdemeanors anymore
HotAir ^ | 4/24/09 | Allahpundit

Posted on 04/24/2009 4:54:40 PM PDT by Crazieman

Emphasis on announces . I’ve read this piece three times and can’t convince myself that I’m not missing something obvious that makes it all perfectly rational. Surely if a D.A. were forced to turn his district into a free-fire zone for certain crimes, he wouldn’t broadcast to the public what those crimes are.

Right?

The decision not to go after any perpetrators of certain offenses, Grove said, amounts to “holding up a sign and advertising to the criminal element to come to Contra Costa County, because we’re no longer going to prosecute you.”

Don’t even bother submitting the cases, Kochly said Monday in a memo to the Contra Costa County Police Chiefs Association. “If they are submitted, they will be screened out by category by support staff and returned to your department without review by a deputy district attorney,” he wrote…

Supervisor John Gioia, who represents Richmond, said the list of crimes that Kochly says he won’t prosecute is far longer now than what he told the board during its budget deliberations.

“I don’t think it’s a good idea for the chief prosecutor in the county to inform the public at large what cases they’re not going to prosecute,” Gioia said…

Kochly said prosecutors will still consider charging suspects with certain misdemeanors, including domestic violence, driving under the influence, firearms offenses, vehicular manslaughter , sex crimes and assault with a deadly weapon.

Also among the offenses he won’t prosecute, according to the following clip: Grand theft and hit and run . Seriously, what am I missing here? Click the image to watch.



TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: california; contracosta; contracostacounty; corruption; crime; democrats; economy; first100days

1 posted on 04/24/2009 4:54:41 PM PDT by Crazieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Crazieman

I strongly suspect this is a ploy to convince the public that the spigot to public spending must NOT be turned off...


2 posted on 04/24/2009 4:57:05 PM PDT by John123 (The US may be going down the drain, but everyone else will drown first...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Crazieman

All California is giving the obvious S.O.S. and the dolts in Sacramento still don’t get it.


3 posted on 04/24/2009 4:57:29 PM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (Beat a better path, and the world will build a mousetrap at your door.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Crazieman

I didn’t see “speeding tickets” on the list. It must be one of those crimes that are on top of the most dangerous crimes list.


4 posted on 04/24/2009 5:01:11 PM PDT by Enterprise (Hey Pirates - you got yer asses kicked!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Crazieman

Absurd. They should have fired the police, fire/paramedics, teachers, shut down garbage collection and water before it came to this.

That’s how they do it by me. We usually cry uncle just at the announcement stage and pay up.


5 posted on 04/24/2009 5:16:38 PM PDT by 1010RD (First Do No Harm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Crazieman

If you think about misdemeanor statutes, two things are obvious. The first is that there are a vast number of them, and the second is that many are pretty frivolous. But the devil is in the details.

For example, grand theft and hit and run sound serious, but *typically*, what do those amount to, at the prosecutorial level? In the story, a woman was complaining about check fraud, but there is an easy way around that for retailers: do not accept personal checks.

Hit and run? You would think hit and run where someone is seriously injured or killed, but that is the exception. Most hit and runs are dented fenders or single vehicle accidents against property.

Annoying, yes. And if they could prosecute for it, it would be nice. Nice but not essential.

So what does this mean in Contra Costa County? Well, probably not that much. There are probably few or no “county islands” that are not part of some city, so if you are too obnoxious, the city police will nail you.


6 posted on 04/24/2009 5:17:10 PM PDT by yefragetuwrabrumuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Crazieman
i thought selective enforcement of the law was a crime...
7 posted on 04/24/2009 5:19:36 PM PDT by Chode (American Hedonist - Obama is basically Jim Jones with a teleprompter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: John123
I strongly suspect this is a ploy to convince the public that the spigot to public spending must NOT be turned off...

Yep.

8 posted on 04/24/2009 5:20:43 PM PDT by Talisker (When you find a turtle on top of a fence post, you can be damn sure it didn't get there on it's own.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Crazieman

Misdemeanors should be a profit center for the county. He’s probably playing hardball to get a bigger slice of the pie for his office.


9 posted on 04/24/2009 5:26:42 PM PDT by PAR35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Crazieman

This is the law-enforcement equivalent of the school superintendent who threatens that the schools will have to cancel recess and arts & crafts unless the taxpayers agree to their extortionate budget increase demands...


10 posted on 04/24/2009 6:10:30 PM PDT by Zeppo (Save the cheerleader, save the world...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Enterprise

Most people pay them and don’t contest them and they are big money makers so they will be prosecuted, but if you force a trial then your probably home free (after you pay your lawyer). Of course most people don’t fight them because of the time it takes and if you lose the judge will be ticked off about taking the courts time and think about a max sentence.


11 posted on 04/24/2009 7:06:54 PM PDT by airedale ( XZ)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson