If the much respected Dr. Sowell has deigned to write for WND, I guess the site can't be all bad. The broader the variety of people who are more apt to come across his writings from various sources, the better for the conservative cause. I love to read Dr. Sowell's essays!
To: My hearts in London - Everett
The only people that have a problem with WND are leftist, libertarians, atheists, homo activists..
2 posted on
04/21/2009 11:41:43 PM PDT by
DirtyHarryY2K
(The Tree of Liberty is long overdue for its natural manure)
To: My hearts in London - Everett
WND does break some good stories. I’m just glad they quit advertising embarrassing crap. I had an email exchange with Joe Farah about that but he eventually did the right thing. I must say I’ve been impressed with the improvements to the quality of news on the site and Joe never let the issue of the Ramas and Compean drop.
4 posted on
04/21/2009 11:45:04 PM PDT by
Maelstorm
(It is better to to get outside of the box than to just think outside of it.)
To: My hearts in London - Everett
I’ve seen WND really screw up at times but for the most part they are honest journalists. They have broken many stories the MSM would either have buried or spun.
10 posted on
04/22/2009 1:19:52 AM PDT by
Nateman
(If liberals aren't screaming you're doing it wrong.)
To: My hearts in London - Everett; abigail2; Alia; Amalie; American Quilter; arthurus; awelliott; ...
11 posted on
04/22/2009 8:46:20 AM PDT by
jazusamo
(But there really is no free lunch, except in the world of political rhetoric,.: Thomas Sowell)
To: My hearts in London - Everett
Glad to see Dr. Sowell added to WND. I think they’ve gone a long way to establish credibility.
With Chuck Norris and now Dr. Sowell their line-up of responsible commentators is growing.
17 posted on
04/23/2009 3:41:36 AM PDT by
Tainan
(Where's my FOF Indicator?)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson