Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 04/21/2009 3:35:58 PM PDT by Flavius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Flavius

China: Hey all we stole was Colin Powells porn and a few nuclear weapon schematics. We didn’t touch the damned JSF. That was Cuba’s fault


2 posted on 04/21/2009 3:39:31 PM PDT by utherdoul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Flavius
Why would the ChiComs steal it? We have another President that will surely sell it for a generous reelection donation.
3 posted on 04/21/2009 3:39:58 PM PDT by BallyBill (Serial Hit-N-Run poster)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Flavius
All hale our overlords the Chinese!!!

We bow before you with many gifts!!!

Hope you liked the missile targeting stuff from Loral back 10 years ago, but now we have this Joint Strike Fighter for your pleasure.

Signed

Bam bam.....

4 posted on 04/21/2009 3:40:31 PM PDT by Vaquero ("an armed society is a polite society" Robert A. Heinlein)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Flavius

Well, that would save them the trouble of paying Israel in a few years to give them the blueprints.


5 posted on 04/21/2009 3:42:52 PM PDT by Terpfen (Ain't over yet, folks. Those 2004 Senate gains are up for grabs in 2 years.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Flavius

Wouldn’t surprise me.

I can’t imagine why it’s so difficult to design a computer system that can be used by several company locations but is immune to any internet cracking.

That any internet access by any offices has to go through one locked down gateway.

Not being very computer savvy , am I in a pipe dream?


6 posted on 04/21/2009 3:43:13 PM PDT by Vinnie (You're Nobody 'Til Somebody Jihads You)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Flavius

ISn’t the DOD using SIPRNet or NIPRNet?


8 posted on 04/21/2009 3:47:36 PM PDT by jaydubya2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Flavius
(Stolen Joint Strike Fighter)

Are fighters necessary anymore? If battles are taking place beyond the vision of the pilot and he is operating from cockpit displays, he should be in a room in Topeka instead of in the plane.

The pilot is the limiting factor in the manueverability of the plane and his protection and survivability is the cause of much of the cost and complexity of the plane.

Imagine a force of 1000 unmanned planes attacking with 100 of them piloted by the top aces. The next 900 have junior pilots (or autopilot) bringing them toward the battle for replacement of the ones lost out of the first group.

Between intense battles, pilots can go to the restroom or take coffee breaks while others bring their planes back or take it toward the scene of the next battle.

Imagine the 21-year-old gamers who could dominate at this type of battle (with no risk of becoming POWs.)

9 posted on 04/21/2009 3:58:23 PM PDT by Onelifetogive (Check out Puppy News at www.buyingapuppy.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Flavius

Whew! That’s certainly a load off of my mind!


11 posted on 04/21/2009 5:06:17 PM PDT by SuperLuminal (Where is another agitator for republicanism like Sam Adams when we need him?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson