Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Lawmakers Fried For Bringing Home Bacon (GOP just as guilty as Democrats)
The Washington Times ^ | April 20, 2009 | S.A. Miller

Posted on 04/21/2009 4:48:44 AM PDT by kellynla

Capitol Hill lawmakers still brag about the federal dollars and projects they bring home. But in an age of taxpayer-financed bailouts and massive budget deficits, members are increasingly on the defensive about pork-barrel spending.

Pet projects are targets for charges of government waste during tough economic times, and earmarks stuffed into appropriations bills smack of Washington backroom dealing.

Republicans, laboring to re-establish the party's reputation for fiscal restraint, are bearing the brunt of the criticism and being hit from all sides.

Rep. Mary Fallin, a Republican contender in the 2010 Oklahoma governor's race, was criticized last week by her primary rival for not "practicing what she preaches" when it comes to pork spending.

"She is just as guilty on the runaway federal spending that she rails against," said state Sen. Randy Brogdon, who pointed out that Mrs. Fallin requested more than $243 million in pet projects for the upcoming fiscal year.

Lawmakers rarely acquire all the federal funding they request for the projects, but all of the requests are posted on their office Web pages under new earmark disclosure rules.

Mrs. Fallin secured 13 projects worth $4.8 million in the 2009 appropriations bills, according to an earmark tally by Citizens Against Government Waste.

The nonprofit watchdog group's annual "Pig Book," published last week, spawned scores of news reports about pet projects sponsored by members of both parties and supplied fodder for campaign attacks.

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtontimes.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Extended News; Government; Politics/Elections; US: Oklahoma
KEYWORDS: 111th; bacon; congress; fallin; ok2010; pork
TERM LIMITS is the only solution!
1 posted on 04/21/2009 4:48:44 AM PDT by kellynla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: kellynla

term limits is a bandaid. government inherently expands until the people rise up and say enough is enough.


2 posted on 04/21/2009 4:51:21 AM PDT by Always Right (Obama: more arrogant than Bill Clinton, more naive than Jimmy Carter, and more liberal than LBJ.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Always Right
“term limits is a bandaid?”

Well, don't keep us in suspense...if term limits is a “band-aid”...what's your solution?

3 posted on 04/21/2009 4:53:05 AM PDT by kellynla (Freedom of speech makes it easier to spot the idiots! Semper Fi!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Always Right

What sort of system do you want. Earmarks by Congressman or Nonearmarks by Executive branch. Earmarks by Congressman is alot more transparent and is why they were elected in the first place.

I think Repubicans on this forum and radio been bleating up the wrong tree


4 posted on 04/21/2009 4:54:01 AM PDT by 4rcane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: kellynla
Michigan has term limits for statewide offices. I originally voted for term limits but I would vote to return to the old way. Many, including myself,voted for term limits because Detroit had a lock on everything in the State. It was the only way to break that stranglehold, and it did for a while. However, now we have people who attempt to leave a legacy at all costs in the few short years they have in office.
The biggest thing is to get rid of all the pension type benefits lawmakers receive. Even in Michigan if you serve 6 years as a state rep or 8 years as a state senator then you have a pension of sorts.
A high school classmate of mine is a state senator in Georgia. The state senate meets only about 3 months out of the year. From what I hear, this works out quite well.
People who desire power will always strive towards power positions so to make them ‘attractive’ is unnecessary.
5 posted on 04/21/2009 5:01:08 AM PDT by midcop402
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: 4rcane
"...and is why they were elected in the first place."

Maybe in our current tyrannical day of reckless spending and holding the individual hostage but near the beginning...

"Such a view of the Constitution would have the effect of giving to Congress a general power of legislation instead of the defined and limited one hitherto understood to belong to them, the terms 'common defense and general welfare' embracing every object and act within the purview of a legislative trust." --- James Madison on vetoing the Bonus Bill of 1817
6 posted on 04/21/2009 5:01:27 AM PDT by rollo tomasi (Working hard to pay for deadbeats and corrupt politicians.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: kellynla

—the guys who wrote the Constitution put in “term limits”—two years for congressthings and six for senators—they didn’t count on the voters turning ignorant nor did they anticipate huge congressional staffs who do all the real stuff anyway—


7 posted on 04/21/2009 5:02:02 AM PDT by rellimpank (--don't believe anything the MSM tells you about firearms or explosives--NRA Benefactor)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: kellynla

We need another revolution like the Contract with America, which quickly produced a balance budget 5 years later. We need people committed to cutting spending. The Contract with America had term limits, and all it accomplished was the good ones who signed up for it ending up quitting when their terms were over and replaced by big spenders. It will take a revolution to get spending under control, not term limits.


8 posted on 04/21/2009 5:14:52 AM PDT by Always Right (Obama: more arrogant than Bill Clinton, more naive than Jimmy Carter, and more liberal than LBJ.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: rellimpank
And the writers of the Constitution didn't count on the districts being so gerrymandered that it is practically impossible to vote these clowns out of office!
9 posted on 04/21/2009 5:25:01 AM PDT by kellynla (Freedom of speech makes it easier to spot the idiots! Semper Fi!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Always Right
“We need another revolution like the Contract with America, which quickly produced a balance budget 5 years later?”

talk about a "band-aid"...LMAO

And fifteen years after the “Contract with America” where are we today? The only thing people are “committed” to once they are elected into Congress is getting reelected!

10 posted on 04/21/2009 5:31:15 AM PDT by kellynla (Freedom of speech makes it easier to spot the idiots! Semper Fi!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: kellynla
“not “practicing what she preaches” when it comes to pork spending.”

One more example: Lamar Alexander, R-TN, supported one of Obummer’s Bankruptus bills and rationalized his vote by stating that certain projects would be funded in his state.

Alexander and other big government Republicans have eviscerated the party. They must be outed then ousted.

11 posted on 04/21/2009 5:35:43 AM PDT by SharpRightTurn (White, black, and red all over--America's affirmative action, metrosexual president.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 4rcane

Earmarks reminds me of the quote from former senator Phil Gramm

“if the Senate voted this afternoon on building a cheese factory on the Moon, I would no doubt vote against it. But if the Senate decided, in its collective lack of wisdom, to build a cheese factory on the Moon, I would want engineers from Texas to design that cheese factory. I would want a construction company from Texas, since we have the best construction companies in the world, to build that cheese factory. If we were going to use milk from earthly cows, I would want milk from Texas cows to be used to make the cheese in the factory on the Moon, and I would want the celestial headquarters for it in Texas. But am I for a cheese factory on the Moon? No.”


12 posted on 04/21/2009 5:44:02 AM PDT by baltoga
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: kellynla

The republican party has more internal liberals in their ranks now days, other than the democrat party, and there may not be a free election anymore now that the communists are in office. They hate free speech and free elections and gun rights and the whole American constitution and may destroy America within the four year period that they have to undermine the Constitutional rights of Americans given us by the God of Israel.


13 posted on 04/21/2009 6:01:33 AM PDT by kindred (Conservatives have 4 years to start a new conservative party or lose more elections.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kellynla

Ditto Term Limits.

The only purpose of pork is to get the critter reelected.

Pork makes incumbents permanent, due to campaign contributions by the recipients of the pork projects.

Kill ALL pork, and the races will be much more competitive.


14 posted on 04/21/2009 6:13:03 AM PDT by Darwin Fish
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson