Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

In Shift, Obama Doesn’t Plan to Reopen Nafta Talks
New York Times ^ | April 20, 2009 | Brian Knowlton

Posted on 04/20/2009 11:47:50 AM PDT by reaganaut1

The Obama administration said on Monday that it has no plans for reopening negotiations on the North American Free Trade Agreement to revise its labor and environmental provisions, as then-Senator Barack Obama promised to do during his presidential campaign.

“The president has said we will look at all of our options, but I think they can be addressed without having to reopen the agreement,” said Ronald Kirk, the United States trade representative.

Mr. Kirk spoke in a conference call with reporters after returning from the Summit of the Americas in Trinidad over the weekend. He said President Obama conferred there with the leaders of Mexico and Canada — the other parties to the free trade agreement — and “they are all of the mind we should look for opportunities to strengthen Nafta.”

Though a formal review of the pact has yet to be completed, Mr. Kirk noted, both Mr. Obama and President Felipe Calderon of Mexico have said that “they don’t believe we have to reopen the agreement now.”

In particular, Mexico, which has seen its exports grow hugely since the agreement was ratified in 1992, has little interest in such a renegotiation.

Mr. Obama was not the only candidate for president who promised during the campaign to renegotiate the accord, a politically popular position in some electorally important Midwestern states that have lost thousands of manufacturing jobs. His chief Democratic rival, Hillary Rodham Clinton, who is now secretary of state, did so as well.

...

Mr. Kirk, the former mayor of Dallas, who is known as a strong free-trade advocate, said that the administration also planned rapid reviews of pending free trade agreements with Colombia and Panama.

(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Canada; Foreign Affairs; Mexico; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 111th; bho44; bhocanada; bhomexico; bhotrade; nafta; obamalies
I think Obama is right to leave NAFTA alone, but he must have known during the campaign that Mexico would not agree to renegotiating it. His economic advisor Goolsbee told Canada as much . Obama lied to get votes, and it worked.
1 posted on 04/20/2009 11:47:51 AM PDT by reaganaut1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

Obama also said he favored lifting the trade embargo on Cuba in 2006. He was confronted with that fact yesterday at his press conference. His reaction was to ask the reporter what he [Obama] was doing at the time.


2 posted on 04/20/2009 11:55:55 AM PDT by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

Just one of his many lies to remind the voters of in 2010 and 2012.


3 posted on 04/20/2009 11:56:36 AM PDT by Red Dog #1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

Obama thanks the union SUCKERS for their vote.


4 posted on 04/20/2009 12:12:30 PM PDT by jaydubya2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1
I guess Obama could not reach the "President of Canada".
5 posted on 04/20/2009 12:18:07 PM PDT by pnh102 (Save America - Ban Ethanol Now!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1
“The president has said we will look at all of our options, but I think they can be addressed without having to reopen the agreement,” said Ronald Kirk, the United States trade representative.

Notice that this totally meaningless string of words was written up by The New York Times as if Mr. Kirk had actually said something. We will "look at all of our options." Of course we will. Everyone does that. It's a motherhood.

Next we are going to "address our options." How exactly does one do that? What does it even mean to "address" an option? Which of our various options are going to be addressed? One? Two? All of them? Since the default option is always "do nothing," it is obvious that we can "address" it without reopening the agreement. This guy just said nothing, and The New York Times thinks it's news.

Saying nothing in polysyllabic tergiversation is a hallmark of the Obama Administration. Did anybody hear Lawrence Summers on Meet the Press? He had to have been prepped with this answer, because the question was about Cuba and Summers is not really involved with foreign policy. The Administration spinmeisters basically stuffed his head with this gibberish:

You know, what the president announced this week is what he's been talking about for two years. It's a set of measures that are grounded in American interests, that are grounded in morality, letting families get back together, together again. Cuba's known what it needs to do for a very long time and it's up to them in terms of their policies, their democratization, all of the steps that they can take. And we'll have to see what happens down the road.
In other words, he wanted to get "Cuba" and "democratization" in the same sentence with "morality" and "families" as if the Obama Administration was going to do something about these things. But they're not. They're not doing anything. "It's up to Cuba" to change their policies. We'll have to "wait and see" what they do. The Obama Administration put this guy on television to mouth pretty words while saying absolutely nothing.

Just as Mr. Kirk did above.


6 posted on 04/20/2009 12:39:10 PM PDT by Nick Danger (I am Obama of Borg. Allegiance is futile. You will be capitulated.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

Lying is the lingua franca of politics. In Cook County it passes for common speech.


7 posted on 04/20/2009 1:24:51 PM PDT by 1010RD (First Do No Harm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

“Regarding Panama, Mr. Kirk said that differences on labor standards and the question of Panama “possibly being a tax haven,” needed resolution.”

There is no way Panama is going to go along with cheeky Kenyan bastard.


8 posted on 04/20/2009 1:26:58 PM PDT by Gatún(CraigIsaMangoTreeLawyer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nick Danger

I thought I knew a lot of words. That is a good one.


9 posted on 04/20/2009 1:27:53 PM PDT by 1010RD (First Do No Harm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

Promises, Promises.

Here’s his promise to work on NAFTA prior to becoming president:

The Obama Change Agenda-

http://changelost.com/economy.html


10 posted on 04/20/2009 2:06:01 PM PDT by NoLibZone (Because I am against Abortion - The DNC Controlled Fed Says I am terrorist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1; SumProVita; HardStarboard; BradyLS; Ernest_at_the_Beach; dervish; Twotone; ...

The List, ping


11 posted on 04/20/2009 8:16:51 PM PDT by Nachum (the complete list at www.nachumlist.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

CHANGE WE CAN BELIEVE IN...LOL


12 posted on 04/20/2009 8:18:24 PM PDT by GSP.FAN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson